vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Angel Oak Mortgage REIT, Inc. (AOMR) and TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. (TLSI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.2M vs $10.9M, roughly 1.2× Angel Oak Mortgage REIT, Inc.). Angel Oak Mortgage REIT, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 103.9% vs -73.9%, a 177.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (59.8% vs 10.4%). Over the past eight quarters, TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (43.0% CAGR vs 12.7%).
Angel Oak Mortgage REIT, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust focused on investing in residential mortgage assets, including non-agency mortgage-backed securities, residential mortgage loans, and credit-linked real estate instruments. It serves U.S. institutional and retail investors, targeting competitive risk-adjusted returns through regular income and long-term capital growth.
TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on advancing immuno-oncology and interventional oncology solutions. It develops proprietary targeted drug delivery technologies designed to improve treatment efficacy for patients with liver, pancreatic and other hard-to-treat solid tumors, primarily operating in North American markets via partnerships with clinical care and research institutions.
AOMR vs TLSI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $10.9M | $13.2M |
| Net Profit | $11.3M | $-9.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 86.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | -24.8% |
| Net Margin | 103.9% | -73.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.4% | 59.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 175.2% | 3.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $10.9M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.2M | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.1M | $9.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.9M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | $7.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.5M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.6M | $6.5M |
| Q4 25 | $11.3M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.4M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $767.0K | $-8.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.5M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-15.1M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.2M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-273.0K | $-4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.9M | $-13.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 86.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 83.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 83.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 83.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 85.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 86.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 87.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 85.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -77.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | -65.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -79.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -152.6% | -91.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -118.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.4% | -111.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -180.8% |
| Q4 25 | 103.9% | -73.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 112.1% | -93.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | -73.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 203.5% | -113.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -152.6% | -122.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 345.9% | -32.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.9% | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 150.1% | -204.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.44 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $-0.96 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.87 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.62 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.29 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.51 | $-0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.6M | $20.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $267.5M | $-33.9M |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $35.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 8.51× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $41.6M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.6M | $22.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.5M | $26.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.7M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.8M | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.1M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.0M | $16.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.4M | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $267.5M | $-33.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $264.2M | $-26.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $246.4M | $-19.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $251.5M | $-34.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.0M | $-25.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $265.1M | $-20.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $255.8M | $-25.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $263.3M | $-36.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $35.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $36.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $41.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $28.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $24.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $32.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $17.9M |
| Q4 25 | 8.51× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.37× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.62× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-407.0M | $-2.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -19.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -35.96× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-19.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-407.0M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-173.4M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.6M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-201.7M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-221.5M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-212.4M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.2M | $-13.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $40.2M | $-10.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-13.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-10.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | -19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -33.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -66.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -57.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -69.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -149.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -183.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -169.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | -35.96× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.19× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.92× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.83× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.81× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.12× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AOMR
| Nonrelated Party | $6.4M | 59% |
| Other | $4.5M | 41% |
TLSI
Segment breakdown not available.
