vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and BRC Inc. (BRCC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BRC Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($112.7M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.1× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). BRC Inc. runs the higher net margin — -2.8% vs -55.2%, a 52.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 6.5%). AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-64.0K vs $-9.4M). Over the past eight quarters, BRC Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.0% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
BRC Inc., operating under the Black Rifle Coffee brand, is a U.S.-headquartered premium coffee and lifestyle brand. It sells roasted coffee beans, ready-to-drink coffee products, branded apparel, and outdoor gear, targeting primarily veteran, first responder, and outdoor enthusiast consumer segments across North America, via both e-commerce and physical retail channels.
AP vs BRCC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $112.7M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $-3.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 32.1% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | -6.3% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | -2.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 6.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | -29.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $112.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $100.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $94.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $90.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $105.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $98.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $89.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $98.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $-486.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-535.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-482.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $548.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 42.9% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | -6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | -13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 4.0% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | -0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | -5.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $4.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $34.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $45.7M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $209.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 0.76× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $7.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $34.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $35.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $72.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $68.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $65.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $64.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $66.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $61.5M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $45.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $48.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $10.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $11.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $209.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $225.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $222.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $227.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $233.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $229.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $227.2M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | 0.76× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 0.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 7.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 6.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 4.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 4.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 4.46× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | 4.21× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $-8.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $-9.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | -8.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $-13.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $-8.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $4.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $-9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $504.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-205.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $147.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $2.2M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | -4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | -5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 2.2% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 2.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.97× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
BRCC
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $72.9M | 65% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $34.4M | 31% |
| Outpost | $5.4M | 5% |
