vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and NATURES SUNSHINE PRODUCTS INC (NATR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NATURES SUNSHINE PRODUCTS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($123.8M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.2× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). NATURES SUNSHINE PRODUCTS INC runs the higher net margin — 3.3% vs -55.2%, a 58.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 4.7%). NATURES SUNSHINE PRODUCTS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.6M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, NATURES SUNSHINE PRODUCTS INC's revenue compounded faster (5.6% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. also known as "NSP", is a manufacturer of dietary supplements, including herbs, vitamins, minerals, and personal care products. It is based in Lehi, Utah, with a manufacturing facility in Spanish Fork, Utah.
AP vs NATR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $123.8M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $4.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 72.5% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 4.3% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 3.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 4.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 1379.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $123.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $128.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $114.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $113.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $118.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $114.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $111.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $-321.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 72.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 73.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 71.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 72.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 72.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 71.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 71.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 71.2% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.28 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $93.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $161.6M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $261.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $93.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $95.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $81.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $86.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $84.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $78.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $68.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $77.8M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $2.1M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $161.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $166.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $163.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $167.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $161.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $162.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $156.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $159.7M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $261.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $264.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $254.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $252.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $240.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $245.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $235.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $247.3M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | 0.01× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $9.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $7.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $28.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $18.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $12.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $2.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $16.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $10.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $-1.5M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.41× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.46× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 0.55× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.94× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
NATR
| Other | $68.1M | 55% |
| General Health Products | $20.2M | 16% |
| Digestive Products | $13.8M | 11% |
| Cardiovascular Products | $12.1M | 10% |
| Personal Care Products | $4.4M | 4% |
| Immunity Products | $3.1M | 3% |
| Weight Management Products | $2.1M | 2% |
