vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP (PGC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $78.2M, roughly 1.3× PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP). PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs -55.2%, a 70.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.5% vs 11.5%). PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($28.8M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (21.4% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Peapack Gladstone Financial Corp is a U.S.-based regional financial holding company that provides commercial and consumer banking, wealth management, private banking, lending solutions, and trust services, primarily serving individual and small-to-medium business clients across New Jersey and the surrounding U.S. Northeast region.
AP vs PGC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $78.2M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $12.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 21.7% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 15.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 26.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 31.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $70.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $64.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $61.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $56.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $56.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $53.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $9.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $7.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 19.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 16.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 23.4% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 16.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.54 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.43 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.52 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $658.2M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $7.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $658.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $642.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $629.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $621.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $605.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $607.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $588.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $582.4M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $7.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $6.4B |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $43.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $28.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 36.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 18.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $61.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $43.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $36.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $15.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $71.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $24.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $852.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $19.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $-431.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $18.0M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 36.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | -17.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 101.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 40.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 33.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.76× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | -1.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 7.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
PGC
| Banking Segment | $61.4M | 79% |
| Wealth Management Division | $13.9M | 18% |
| Other | $2.9M | 4% |
