vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and CPI Card Group Inc. (PMTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CPI Card Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($153.1M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.5× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). CPI Card Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.8% vs -55.2%, a 60.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CPI Card Group Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (22.3% vs 11.5%). CPI Card Group Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($35.2M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, CPI Card Group Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.9% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
CPI Card Group Inc. is a leading provider of payment card production and associated solutions, including contactless and contact credit/debit cards, prepaid cards, and card personalization services. It primarily serves financial institutions, fintech firms, and retail brands across its core North American market.
AP vs PMTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $153.1M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $7.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 31.5% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 12.0% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 4.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 22.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 8.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $153.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $138.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $129.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $122.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $125.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $124.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $118.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $111.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $518.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $5.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 30.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 37.1% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 7.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 4.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.40 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.56 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.51 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $21.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $286.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $-17.3M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $403.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $17.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $31.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $33.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $14.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $17.1M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $286.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $308.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $310.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $280.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $280.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $280.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $269.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $265.3M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $-17.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $-25.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $-29.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $-29.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $-42.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $-44.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $-48.5M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $403.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $407.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $399.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $351.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $349.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $342.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $321.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $319.8M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $39.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $35.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 23.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 2.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 5.39× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $41.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $39.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $5.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $26.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $8.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $35.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $533.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $292.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $7.4M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 23.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 17.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | -5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 6.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.39× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.32× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 1.17× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 3.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | -0.79× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
PMTS
| US Debit And Credit | $128.9M | 84% |
| US Prepaid Debit | $24.4M | 16% |
