vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $71.1M, roughly 1.5× RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.). RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 2.0% vs -55.2%, a 57.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs -1.8%). RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($33.5M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP's revenue compounded faster (-2.6% CAGR vs -4.7%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
RE/MAX is an international real estate franchise operating in over 100 countries and territories that, in 2015, had over 100,000 agents in 6,800 offices.
AP vs RMAX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $71.1M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $1.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 13.1% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | -1.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | -75.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $71.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $73.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $74.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $72.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $78.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $78.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $78.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $966.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-3.4M |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 25.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 19.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | -4.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $118.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $432.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $452.4M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $582.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 0.96× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $118.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $107.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $94.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $89.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $96.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $83.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $66.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $82.1M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $432.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $433.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $434.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $435.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $436.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $437.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $438.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $439.0M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $452.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $448.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $442.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $433.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $429.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $423.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $418.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $412.0M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $582.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $582.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $574.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $571.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $581.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $578.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $571.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $566.7M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | 0.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 0.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 1.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 1.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 1.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | 1.07× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $40.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $33.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 47.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 10.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 28.39× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $56.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $40.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $17.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $59.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $15.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $9.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $33.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $53.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $16.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $6.8M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 47.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 73.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 17.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 8.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.39× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 10.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.22× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 4.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
RMAX
| Franchising Segment | $50.1M | 70% |
| Broker Fees | $13.9M | 20% |
| Annual Dues | $7.4M | 10% |
