vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ROGERS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($200.5M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.9× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). ROGERS CORP runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs -55.2%, a 57.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 5.2%). ROGERS CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.1M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP's revenue compounded faster (-2.6% CAGR vs -3.3%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
AP vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | — |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $214.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $119.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 2.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
ROG
Segment breakdown not available.
