vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC (TR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($196.3M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.9× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 14.7% vs -55.2%, a 69.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 1.5%). TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($61.0M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Tootsie Roll Industries is an American manufacturer of confectionery based in Chicago, Illinois. Its best-known products include the namesake Tootsie Rolls and Tootsie Pops. Tootsie Roll Industries currently markets its brands internationally in Canada, Mexico, and over 75 other countries.
AP vs TR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $196.3M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $28.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.7% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 17.0% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 14.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $196.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $232.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $155.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $148.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $193.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $225.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $150.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $153.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $18.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $22.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $32.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $15.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $15.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 32.7% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 20.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $176.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $941.0M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $176.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $119.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $170.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $176.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $194.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $163.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $131.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $159.4M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $941.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $918.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $893.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $879.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $870.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $870.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $841.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $834.4M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $73.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $61.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 31.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 6.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $96.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $73.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $62.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $68.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $-12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $21.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $61.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $50.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $750.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $64.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $55.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $-16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $16.9M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 31.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 33.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 24.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.49× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 0.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 3.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | -0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.35× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
TR
| Products | $194.3M | 99% |
| Rental And Royalty | $1.9M | 1% |
