vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. (VRTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($208.0M vs $104.4M, roughly 2.0× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 16.3% vs -55.2%, a 71.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs -10.9%). AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-64.0K vs $-74.1M). Over the past eight quarters, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP's revenue compounded faster (-2.6% CAGR vs -3.2%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC.VRTSEarnings & Financial Report
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. is an American company which operates as a multi-manager asset management business, comprising a number of individual affiliated managers, each having its own investment process and brand, and the services of unaffiliated sub advisers.
AP vs VRTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $208.0M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $33.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 19.1% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 16.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | -10.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | -14.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $5.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $208.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $216.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $210.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $217.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $233.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $227.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $224.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $222.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $33.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $42.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $28.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $39.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $37.9M |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 19.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 14.5% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 11.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 17.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $5.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $4.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $6.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $4.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $4.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $5.71 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $2.43 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $4.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $390.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $934.0M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $4.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $390.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $231.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $231.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $232.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $237.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $247.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $253.0M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $934.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $918.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $896.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $893.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $897.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $889.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $868.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $871.7M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $3.5B |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | 0.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 0.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 0.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 0.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 0.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | 0.29× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $-67.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $-74.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | -35.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 3.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -1.99× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $100.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $-67.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $108.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $75.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $70.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $-34.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $-74.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $106.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $74.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $68.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $68.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $-36.5M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | -35.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | -3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -16.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.99× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | -0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 2.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.91× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
VRTS
| Open End Funds | $68.9M | 33% |
| Retail Separate Accounts | $51.3M | 25% |
| Institutional Accounts | $39.6M | 19% |
| Administration And Shareholder Service Fees | $18.4M | 9% |
| Closed End Funds | $15.9M | 8% |
| Distribution And Service Fees | $12.3M | 6% |
