vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. (APAM) and Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($335.5M vs $295.4M, roughly 1.1× Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.). Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. runs the higher net margin — 35.2% vs 6.7%, a 28.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs 2.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.7% CAGR vs 4.0%).
Artisan Partners is an American asset management company headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Outside the United States, the company has offices in Dublin, Hong Kong, London, Singapore and Sydney.
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. is a real estate investment trust that invests in hotels. As of December 31, 2024, it owned 31 hotels comprising 9,408 rooms.
APAM vs XHR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $335.5M | $295.4M |
| Net Profit | $118.1M | $19.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 39.2% | 14.1% |
| Net Margin | 35.2% | 6.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.9% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 34.9% | 26.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.36 | $0.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $295.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $335.5M | $265.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $301.3M | $236.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $282.7M | $287.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $277.1M | $288.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $297.1M | $261.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $279.6M | $236.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $270.8M | $272.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $19.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $118.1M | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.8M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.6M | $55.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.1M | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $87.5M | $-638.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.0M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.6M | $15.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 30.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 39.2% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.2% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.2% | 12.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.7% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.3% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.0% | 11.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.9% | 19.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.1% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.5% | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | -3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.3% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.36 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.93 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.94 | $0.56 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.82 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.99 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.03 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.80 | $0.15 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $101.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $190.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $438.8M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $2.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.43× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $101.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $140.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $188.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $172.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $112.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $161.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $143.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $190.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $200.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $200.0M | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $438.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $402.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $381.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $356.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $372.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $341.2M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.43× | 1.25× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.47× | 1.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | 1.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.51× | 1.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | 1.11× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.59× | 1.09× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $172.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $171.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 51.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 23.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.46× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $420.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $172.0M | $21.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.4M | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.9M | $36.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.9M | $54.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $372.8M | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $112.8M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.9M | $57.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $171.6M | $5.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.4M | $44.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.9M | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.7M | $22.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $371.3M | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $112.4M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.2M | $21.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 51.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 125.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.8% | 7.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 11.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 13.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.46× | 3.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.75× | 0.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.58× | 3.51× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.26× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.32× | 3.73× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APAM
Segment breakdown not available.
XHR
| Rooms revenues | $164.4M | 56% |
| Food and beverage revenues | $105.0M | 36% |
| Other revenues | $26.0M | 9% |
