vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Apollo Global Management (APO) and Sea Ltd (SE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sea Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($22.9B vs $9.9B, roughly 2.3× Apollo Global Management). Sea Ltd runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs 6.9%, a 0.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sea Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (363.4% vs 86.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Sea Ltd's revenue compounded faster (147.8% CAGR vs 18.4%).
Apollo Global Management, Inc. is an American asset management firm that primarily invests in alternative assets. As of 2025, the company had $840 billion of assets under management, including $392 billion invested in credit, including mezzanine capital, hedge funds, non-performing loans, and collateralized loan obligations, $99 billion invested in private equity, and $46.2 billion invested in real assets, which includes real estate and infrastructure. The company invests money on behalf of p...
Sea Limited is a tech conglomerate headquartered in Singapore. It is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, with revenue of US$16.8 billion (2024). Sea currently functions as a holding company for Garena, Monee and Shopee, the largest e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia.
APO vs SE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.9B | $22.9B |
| Net Profit | $684.0M | $1.6B |
| Gross Margin | — | 44.7% |
| Operating Margin | 17.8% | 8.7% |
| Net Margin | 6.9% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 86.7% | 363.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -54.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.09 | $2.52 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.9B | $22.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.8B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0B | $3.7B |
| Q4 25 | $684.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $375.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $630.0M | $414.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $442.0M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $811.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $853.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $-23.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 46.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 41.6% |
| Q4 25 | 17.8% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.4% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.3% | 9.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.1% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.0% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.3% | -0.6% |
| Q4 25 | $1.09 | $2.52 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.78 | $0.59 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.99 | $0.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.68 | $0.65 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.41 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.29 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.35 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.28 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $10.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $13.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $23.3B | $12.6B |
| Total Assets | $460.9B | $29.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.57× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $23.3B | $12.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.3B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | $460.9B | $29.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $449.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $419.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $395.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $377.9B | $22.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $368.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $346.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $334.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.65× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.7B | $5.0B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.83× | 3.12× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.7B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $303.0M | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $756.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $70.0M | $468.5M |
| Q4 25 | 6.83× | 3.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.17× | 9.46× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.00× | 5.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.05× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APO
| Retirement Services Segment | $8.5B | 86% |
| Asset Management1 | $681.0M | 7% |
| Principal Investing Segment | $624.0M | 6% |
| Management Service Incentive | $96.0M | 1% |
SE
Segment breakdown not available.
