vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aptiv (APTV) and CALERES INC (CAL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Aptiv is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.2B vs $790.1M, roughly 6.5× CALERES INC). Aptiv runs the higher net margin — 2.7% vs 0.3%, a 2.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CALERES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs 5.0%). Aptiv produced more free cash flow last quarter ($651.0M vs $-12.4M). Over the past eight quarters, CALERES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs 2.5%).
Aptiv PLC is an American automotive technology supplier with headquarters in Schaffhausen, Switzerland. Aptiv grew out of the now-defunct American company, Delphi Automotive Systems, which itself was formerly a component of General Motors.
Caleres Inc. is an American footwear company that owns and operates a variety of footwear brands. Its headquarters is located in Clayton, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. The company was founded in 1878 as Bryan, Brown & Company in St. Louis, though it underwent several name changes. The Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company was the largest manufacturer of shoes in America in the early 20th century, but it went bankrupt in June 1939.
APTV vs CAL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.2B | $790.1M |
| Net Profit | $138.0M | $2.4M |
| Gross Margin | 18.7% | 41.8% |
| Operating Margin | 8.2% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 2.7% | 0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.0% | 6.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -48.5% | -94.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.63 | $0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $790.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $658.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $614.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $639.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9B | $740.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9B | $683.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.1B | $659.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.9B | $697.1M |
| Q4 25 | $138.0M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-355.0M | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $393.0M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.0M | $4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $268.0M | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $363.0M | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $938.0M | $30.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $218.0M | $55.7M |
| Q4 25 | 18.7% | 41.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.1% | 45.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.1% | 43.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.6% | 44.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 46.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.9% | 43.9% |
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.5% | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | 8.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.63 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.80 | $0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.22 | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.48 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.47 | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.79 | $1.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | $34.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $7.5B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.2B | $616.8M |
| Total Assets | $23.4B | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.81× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $34.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $191.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $33.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $29.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $941.0M | $21.4M |
| Q4 25 | $7.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.2B | $616.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.3B | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $605.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.0B | $599.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | $598.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9B | $606.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $570.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.1B | $560.6M |
| Q4 25 | $23.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.6B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.80× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.89× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.93× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.42× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $818.0M | $-1.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $651.0M | $-12.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.6% | -1.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.93× | -0.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.5B | $14.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $818.0M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $584.0M | $47.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $510.0M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $273.0M | $28.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $-39.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $499.0M | $79.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $643.0M | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $244.0M | $43.0M |
| Q4 25 | $651.0M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.0M | $35.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $361.0M | $-26.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.0M | $18.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $894.0M | $-57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $326.0M | $68.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $417.0M | $26.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-21.0M | $32.4M |
| Q4 25 | 12.6% | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.2% | -7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.4% | 4.6% |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 5.93× | -0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | -0.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.96× | -0.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.37× | 2.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.69× | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.12× | 0.77× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APTV
| Electrical Distribution Systems | $2.3B | 45% |
| Engineered Components Group | $1.4B | 28% |
| Active Safety | $716.0M | 14% |
| User Experience And Other | $564.0M | 11% |
| Smart Vehicle Compute And Software | $154.0M | 3% |
CAL
| Brand Portfolio | $383.7M | 49% |
| Landed Wholesale | $148.1M | 19% |
| Wholesale E Commerce | $75.0M | 9% |
| Ecommerce | $68.8M | 9% |
| Stuart Weitzman Brand | $45.8M | 6% |
| Landed Wholesale Ecommerce Drop Ship | $30.6M | 4% |
| First Cost Wholesale | $14.9M | 2% |
| Clt Brand Solutions | $10.2M | 1% |
| License And Royalty | $2.1M | 0% |
