vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORP LTD (APWC) and Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Borr Drilling Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($267.7M vs $225.3M, roughly 1.2× ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORP LTD).
Disney Networks Group Asia Pacific was a Hong Kong–based commercial broadcasting company operating multiple specialty television channels. The company was founded in 1991 by Hong Kong - Canadian businessman Richard Li.
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
APWC vs BORR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2022 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $225.3M | $267.7M |
| Net Profit | — | $35.1M |
| Gross Margin | 7.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.2% | 36.0% |
| Net Margin | — | 13.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 10.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | — | $267.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $271.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $187.5M | ||
| Q2 22 | $225.3M | $105.3M |
| Q2 25 | — | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $31.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $800.0K | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-165.3M |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 7.9% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | 36.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 38.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 31.9% | ||
| Q2 22 | 2.2% | -116.8% |
| Q2 25 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -157.0% |
| Q2 25 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-1.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $92.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $1.0B |
| Total Assets | — | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | $92.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $195.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $83.8M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $29.7M |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $281.8M |
| Q2 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $999.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $906.2M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $711.5M |
| Q2 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $3.0B |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 0.40× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $6.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.18× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-8.5M |
| Q2 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 3.00× | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APWC
Segment breakdown not available.
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
