vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORP LTD (APWC) and ECARX Holdings Inc. (ECX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ECARX Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($323.3M vs $225.3M, roughly 1.4× ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORP LTD).
Disney Networks Group Asia Pacific was a Hong Kong–based commercial broadcasting company operating multiple specialty television channels. The company was founded in 1991 by Hong Kong - Canadian businessman Richard Li.
ECARX Holdings Inc. is a global mobility technology provider specializing in integrated smart vehicle solutions, including in-vehicle infotainment systems, advanced driver assistance technologies, and connected car cloud services. It primarily partners with automotive manufacturers across the world, with a strong operational presence in the Chinese and European markets.
APWC vs ECX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2022 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $225.3M | $323.3M |
| Net Profit | — | $-69.1M |
| Gross Margin | 7.9% | 15.5% |
| Operating Margin | 2.2% | -20.2% |
| Net Margin | — | -21.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 6.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 12.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | — | $323.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $303.5M | ||
| Q2 22 | $225.3M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $-69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-79.2M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.6% | ||
| Q2 22 | 7.9% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | -20.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -22.2% | ||
| Q2 22 | 2.2% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | -21.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -26.1% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.23 | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $86.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $-293.7M |
| Total Assets | — | $494.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | $86.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $108.4M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $-293.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-198.5M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $494.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $555.0M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-82.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-86.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -26.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | $-82.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-57.1M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $-86.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-64.9M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | -26.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -21.4% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
