vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORP LTD (APWC) and HANCOCK WHITNEY CORP (HWC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HANCOCK WHITNEY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($295.0M vs $225.3M, roughly 1.3× ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORP LTD).
Disney Networks Group Asia Pacific was a Hong Kong–based commercial broadcasting company operating multiple specialty television channels. The company was founded in 1991 by Hong Kong - Canadian businessman Richard Li.
Hancock Whitney Corp. is an American bank holding company headquartered in Gulfport, Mississippi. It operates 237 branches in Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, and Texas. The bank is the official bank of the New Orleans Saints and issues the official debit card. The bank is also the official bank of LSU Athletics and the Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns, being the exclusive provider of credit cards for the LSU Tigers, as well as debit cards for both athletic brands.
APWC vs HWC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2022 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $225.3M | $295.0M |
| Net Profit | — | $47.4M |
| Gross Margin | 7.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.2% | — |
| Net Margin | — | 16.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -19.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -60.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $295.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $389.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $385.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $364.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $364.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $367.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $359.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $47.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $127.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 40.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 39.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.57 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.49 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.38 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $223.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | — |
| Total Assets | — | $35.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $223.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $199.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $210.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $210.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $210.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $210.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $236.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $236.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $35.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $35.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $35.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $35.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $34.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $35.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $35.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $35.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
