vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORP LTD (APWC) and MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORP LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($225.3M vs $202.3M, roughly 1.1× MARA Holdings, Inc.).
Disney Networks Group Asia Pacific was a Hong Kong–based commercial broadcasting company operating multiple specialty television channels. The company was founded in 1991 by Hong Kong - Canadian businessman Richard Li.
MARA Holdings, Inc. is an American digital asset technology and cryptocurrency mining company headquartered in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Founded in 2010, the company initially operated as a patent holding company before pivoting in the late 2010s to focus on blockchain infrastructure and digital assets.
APWC vs MARA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2022 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $225.3M | $202.3M |
| Net Profit | — | $-1.7B |
| Gross Margin | 7.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.2% | -11795.9% |
| Net Margin | — | -14298.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -5.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -423.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-4.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $202.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $252.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $238.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $213.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $214.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $131.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $145.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $165.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $123.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $808.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-533.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $528.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-124.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-199.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $337.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2613.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1065.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -587.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -289.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -11795.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -253.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -130.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -160.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -14298.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 338.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -249.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5367.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -94.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -137.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 204.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.55 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.60 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.42 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.72 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $547.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $3.5B |
| Total Assets | — | $7.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $547.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $826.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $109.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $196.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $391.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $164.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $256.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $324.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $618.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-802.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-1.2B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -598.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 201.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-2.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-802.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-199.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-163.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-215.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-677.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-160.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-115.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-88.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-283.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-282.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-254.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-927.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-198.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-132.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-97.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | -598.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -112.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -118.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -118.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -432.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -150.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -91.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -59.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 201.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 49.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 117.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.62× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
