vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORP LTD (APWC) and OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC (OIS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORP LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($225.3M vs $178.5M, roughly 1.3× OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC).
Disney Networks Group Asia Pacific was a Hong Kong–based commercial broadcasting company operating multiple specialty television channels. The company was founded in 1991 by Hong Kong - Canadian businessman Richard Li.
Oil States International, Inc. is an American multinational corporation. It focuses on providing services to oil and gas companies. It is a public company listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
APWC vs OIS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2022 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $225.3M | $178.5M |
| Net Profit | — | $-117.2M |
| Gross Margin | 7.9% | 10.9% |
| Operating Margin | 2.2% | -63.7% |
| Net Margin | — | -65.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 8.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -873.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-1.99 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $178.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $165.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $165.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $159.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $164.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $174.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $186.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $167.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-117.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-14.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-13.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 21.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -63.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -65.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -8.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.99 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $69.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $573.2M |
| Total Assets | — | $883.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $69.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $67.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $53.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $66.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $65.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $46.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $25.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $24.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $124.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $124.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $124.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $124.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $135.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $573.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $689.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $690.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $683.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $680.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $684.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $690.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $692.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $883.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $993.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $990.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $994.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.20× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $50.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $47.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 26.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $73.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $50.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $30.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $28.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-11.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $47.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $137.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $21.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-21.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -12.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.33× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.94× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APWC
Segment breakdown not available.
OIS
| Project Driven | $112.6M | 63% |
| Downhole Technologies | $32.1M | 18% |
| Completion And Production Services | $23.1M | 13% |
| Military And Other Products | $10.7M | 6% |
