vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORP LTD (APWC) and Sezzle Inc. (SEZL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORP LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($225.3M vs $135.5M, roughly 1.7× Sezzle Inc.).
Disney Networks Group Asia Pacific was a Hong Kong–based commercial broadcasting company operating multiple specialty television channels. The company was founded in 1991 by Hong Kong - Canadian businessman Richard Li.
Sezzle is a publicly traded financial technology company headquartered in Minneapolis, U.S, with operations in the United States and Canada. The company provides an alternative payment platform offering interest-free installment plans at selected online stores. As of June 2021, the Sezzle platform had over 10 million user sign-ups and over 48,000 participating merchants.
APWC vs SEZL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2022 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $225.3M | $135.5M |
| Net Profit | — | $51.3M |
| Gross Margin | 7.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.2% | 50.9% |
| Net Margin | — | 37.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 29.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 41.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $135.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $57.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $52.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $48.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $48.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $35.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $51.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $42.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $26.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $27.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $36.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 50.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 70.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 61.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 63.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 58.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 55.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 37.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 54.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 46.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 53.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 75.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 98.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $196.7M |
| Total Assets | — | $454.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $64.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $88.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $88.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $73.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $80.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $58.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $196.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $169.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $130.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $125.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $87.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $61.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $50.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $454.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $400.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $367.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $350.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $298.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $298.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $252.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $212.1M |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
