vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORP LTD (APWC) and STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORP LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($225.3M vs $224.2M, roughly 1.0× STAG Industrial, Inc.).
Disney Networks Group Asia Pacific was a Hong Kong–based commercial broadcasting company operating multiple specialty television channels. The company was founded in 1991 by Hong Kong - Canadian businessman Richard Li.
Stag Arms is a firearms manufacturer founded in May 2003 and located in Cheyenne, Wyoming. Stag Arms is a manufacturer of the AR-15 type rifle, marketed as Stag-15 rifles. Stag advertises that all their weapons and accessories are made in the United States. They are best known for their left-handed AR-15 rifles, which use a mirror imaged upper receiver and have the ejection port reversed for left-handed shooters and the safety selector control on the right side of the lower receiver.
APWC vs STAG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2022 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $225.3M | $224.2M |
| Net Profit | — | $62.0M |
| Gross Margin | 7.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.2% | — |
| Net Margin | — | 27.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 9.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $224.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $220.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $211.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $207.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $205.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $190.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $189.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $41.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $59.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $8.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | — | $7.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $33.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.84× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
