vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AQUABOUNTY TECHNOLOGIES INC (AQB) and Sintx Technologies, Inc. (SINT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sintx Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($290.0K vs $180.2K, roughly 1.6× AQUABOUNTY TECHNOLOGIES INC). Sintx Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -763.8% vs -28035.1%, a 27271.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sintx Technologies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-46.5% vs -77.1%). Sintx Technologies, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-2.4M vs $-5.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Sintx Technologies, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-35.0% CAGR vs -47.5%).
AquaBounty Technologies is a biotechnology and aquaculture company based in Maynard, Massachusetts, United States. The company is notable for its research and development of genetically modified fish. It aims to create products that aim to increase the productivity of aquaculture. As of 2020, sale of the company's AquAdvantage salmon has been approved in Canada and the United States. The company sold all of its operating farms and ceased fish production in 2024.
Sintx Technologies, Inc. is an advanced materials company specializing in R&D and manufacturing of high-performance silicon nitride and other technical ceramic products. It serves key segments including medical implants, aerospace & defense, industrial wear components, and electric vehicle applications, with core markets across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
AQB vs SINT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $180.2K | $290.0K |
| Net Profit | $-50.5M | $-2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 64.8% |
| Operating Margin | -16405.6% | -799.3% |
| Net Margin | -28035.1% | -763.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -77.1% | -46.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -676.1% | -30.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-13.08 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $290.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $208.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $151.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $369.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $542.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $799.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $180.2K | $859.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $477.3K | $687.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-50.5M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.2M | $-886.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 64.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 71.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 73.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 73.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 67.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -799.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1613.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1764.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -645.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -319.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -802.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16405.6% | -315.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -529.4% | -465.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -763.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1701.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1535.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -621.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -312.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -780.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -28035.1% | -256.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2337.9% | -129.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.91 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.96 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.08 | $-3.61 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.90 | $-21.66 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $728.3K | $4.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $10.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $103.3M | $2.9M |
| Total Assets | $127.4M | $9.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.10× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $728.3K | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $5.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.3M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $153.8M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $127.4M | $15.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $176.2M | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.05× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.3M | $-2.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-5.2M | $-2.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2885.9% | -822.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 485.1% | 14.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-45.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.3M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.4M | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.2M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.5M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | -822.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1250.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -368.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -234.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -323.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2885.9% | -299.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1161.2% | -423.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 40.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 485.1% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 235.9% | 25.3% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
