vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA) and Sintx Technologies, Inc. (SINT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nakamoto Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($444.9K vs $290.0K, roughly 1.5× Sintx Technologies, Inc.). Nakamoto Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8374.2% vs -763.8%, a 9138.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Nakamoto Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-26.3% vs -46.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Nakamoto Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-26.7% CAGR vs -35.0%).
Sintx Technologies, Inc. is an advanced materials company specializing in R&D and manufacturing of high-performance silicon nitride and other technical ceramic products. It serves key segments including medical implants, aerospace & defense, industrial wear components, and electric vehicle applications, with core markets across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
NAKA vs SINT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $444.9K | $290.0K |
| Net Profit | $37.3M | $-2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 64.8% |
| Operating Margin | -41198.2% | -799.3% |
| Net Margin | 8374.2% | -763.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -26.3% | -46.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3820.2% | -30.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.68 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $444.9K | $290.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $388.2K | $208.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $408.5K | $151.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $579.7K | $369.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $603.9K | $542.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $647.9K | $799.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $639.1K | $859.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $829.0K | $687.0K |
| Q4 25 | $37.3M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-86.0M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.4M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.0M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.0M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.3M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-282.3K | $-886.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 64.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 71.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 73.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 73.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 67.5% |
| Q4 25 | -41198.2% | -799.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2680.4% | -1613.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -585.4% | -1764.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -179.7% | -645.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -169.3% | -319.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -162.0% | -802.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -162.3% | -315.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.6% | -465.4% |
| Q4 25 | 8374.2% | -763.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -22162.2% | -1701.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -590.9% | -1535.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -179.1% | -621.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -165.8% | -312.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -156.5% | -780.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -206.5% | -256.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -34.1% | -129.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.68 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.42 | $-3.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.35 | $-0.91 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.17 | $-1.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.18 | $17.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $-6.96 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.26 | $-3.61 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.06 | $-21.66 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $22.6M | $4.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $514.3M | $2.9M |
| Total Assets | $730.6M | $9.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $22.6M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.2M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6M | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $287.4K | $5.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.4K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $148.8K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $205.6K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $254.7K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $710.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $514.3M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $477.6M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.0M | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5M | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-383.1K | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $730.6M | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $692.4M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | $15.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $799.3K | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-23.5M | $-2.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-2.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -822.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 14.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.63× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-23.5M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.2M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.9M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-865.1K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.1M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.0M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-913.5K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-213.4K | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.1M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.0M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-224.6K | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | -822.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1250.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -368.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -511.2% | -234.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -161.7% | -323.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -299.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -27.1% | -423.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 40.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 25.3% |
| Q4 25 | -0.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
