vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Alexandria Real Estate Equities (ARE) and CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHART INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $671.0M, roughly 1.6× Alexandria Real Estate Equities). Alexandria Real Estate Equities runs the higher net margin — 59.4% vs 5.0%, a 54.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CHART INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.5% vs -11.5%). Over the past eight quarters, CHART INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs -6.4%).
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (NYSE:ARE), an S&P 500® urban office real estate investment trust (REIT), is the first, longest-tenured, and pioneering owner, operator, and developer uniquely focused on collaborative life science, technology, and agtech campuses in AAA innovation cluster locations, with a total market capitalization of $31.9 billion as of December 31, 2020, and an asset base in North America of 49.7 million square feet (SF). The asset base in North America includes 31.9...
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
ARE vs GTLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $671.0M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $398.4M | $53.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 11.6% |
| Net Margin | 59.4% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -11.5% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 740.6% | -32.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.10 | $1.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $671.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $754.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $751.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $762.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $758.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $788.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $791.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $766.7M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $398.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.1B | $53.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-232.8M | $-138.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-107.0M | $76.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.9M | $49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-62.2M | $79.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $167.9M | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.7M | $58.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.1% |
| Q1 26 | 59.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -143.3% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -31.0% | -12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.0% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.2% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.1% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | $2.10 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-6.35 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.38 | $-3.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.64 | $1.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.38 | $1.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.96 | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $1.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $418.7M | $366.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $19.4B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $34.2B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $418.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $549.1M | $366.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $579.5M | $399.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $520.5M | $342.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $476.4M | $296.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $552.1M | $308.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $562.6M | $310.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $561.0M | $247.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.4B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | $19.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.5B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.6B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.2B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.5B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.3B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | $34.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.1B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.4B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.6B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.6B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.5B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.5B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.8B | $9.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.80× | 1.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.77× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.68× | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.68× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $475.0M | $88.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $66.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 76.0% | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.19× | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $202.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $475.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $312.4M | $88.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $433.5M | $118.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $460.2M | $145.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $207.9M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $274.2M | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $477.4M | $200.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $411.8M | $116.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $66.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-80.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $174.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $88.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.5% |
| Q1 26 | 76.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.84× | 2.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.82× | 1.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARE
| Same properties | $431.4M | 64% |
| Tenant recoveries | $178.2M | 27% |
| Non-same properties | $43.3M | 6% |
| Other | $18.0M | 3% |
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
