vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) and CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.1× CHART INDUSTRIES INC). CHART INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs 3.4%, a 1.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.7% vs -2.5%). Over the past eight quarters, CHART INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs 0.8%).
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc., branded as Floor & Decor, is a multi-channel American specialty retailer of hard surface flooring and related accessories that was founded in 2000 and headquartered in Smyrna, Georgia, United States.
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
FND vs GTLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $39.7M | $53.6M |
| Gross Margin | 44.0% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 11.6% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.7% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.8% | -32.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.37 | $1.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $39.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $39.3M | $53.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.3M | $-138.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.2M | $76.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.9M | $49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.5M | $79.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.7M | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.7M | $58.6M |
| Q1 26 | 44.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.5% | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.4% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.9% | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.8% | 33.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.5% | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.5% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.3% | 33.8% |
| Q1 26 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | 16.1% |
| Q1 26 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | -12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.37 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.36 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.53 | $-3.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.58 | $1.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.45 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.44 | $1.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | $1.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $293.6M | $366.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.5B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $5.6B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $293.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $366.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $399.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $342.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $296.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $308.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $310.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $247.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | $5.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $9.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $109.2M | $88.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $66.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.75× | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $202.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $109.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $124.1M | $88.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.5M | $118.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.1M | $145.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.2M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.4M | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $160.3M | $200.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $194.0M | $116.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $45.1M | $66.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.5M | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.0M | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4M | $-80.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9M | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.5M | $174.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.0M | $88.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 8.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | 2.75× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.15× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.79× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.33× | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.46× | -1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.10× | 2.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.42× | 1.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FND
Segment breakdown not available.
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |