vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ares Management Corp (ARES) and Zebra Technologies (ZBRA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ares Management Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.0× Zebra Technologies). Zebra Technologies runs the higher net margin — 9.0% vs 3.6%, a 5.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ares Management Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.5% vs 14.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Ares Management Corp's revenue compounded faster (45.9% CAGR vs 10.8%).
Ares Management Corporation is a global alternative investment manager operating in the credit, private equity and real estate markets. The company was founded in 1997, with additional offices across North America, Europe, and Asia.
Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBR), commonly known as Zebra, is an American multinational technology conglomerate corporation specializing in smart data capture systems. Zebra is headquartered in Lincolnshire, Illinois outside of Chicago with 10,700 employees across 57 countries.
ARES vs ZBRA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $54.2M | $135.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.6% |
| Operating Margin | 13.7% | 14.4% |
| Net Margin | 3.6% | 9.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 19.5% | 14.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -69.4% | -0.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $2.72 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $788.7M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $135.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $54.2M | $70.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $288.9M | $101.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $137.1M | $112.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.2M | $136.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $177.3M | $163.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $118.5M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $94.9M | $113.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 49.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 47.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 47.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 48.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 48.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.7% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.3% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.3% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.0% | 14.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.8% | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.0% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.2% | 13.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.1% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | 9.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.72 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.97 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.62 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.64 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $114.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.3B | $3.5B |
| Total Assets | $28.6B | $8.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.76× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $114.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $125.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $872.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $879.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $901.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $676.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $411.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.6B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.0B | $8.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.3B | $7.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2B | $7.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.9B | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.5B | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.2B | $7.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.76× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.66× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-483.7M | $176.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -8.92× | 1.30× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $176.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-483.7M | $357.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $235.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $415.7M | $147.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $178.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $807.6M | $306.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $841.3M | $294.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.2M | $288.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $327.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $130.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $158.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $288.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $277.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $278.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q4 25 | -8.92× | 5.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.64× | 2.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.03× | 1.31× | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.28× | 1.31× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.55× | 1.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.10× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.55× | 2.55× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARES
| Management Service | $991.1M | 66% |
| Management Service Incentive | $206.7M | 14% |
| Carried Interest | $205.4M | 14% |
| Fee Related Performance Revenues | $113.3M | 8% |
ZBRA
| Tangible products | $1.2B | 82% |
| Services and software | $264.0M | 18% |
