vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ARGENX SE (ARGX) and Ulta Beauty (ULTA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ulta Beauty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $2.5B, roughly 1.2× ARGENX SE). ARGENX SE runs the higher net margin — 35.5% vs 8.1%, a 27.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ARGENX SE posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (83.2% vs 12.9%). ARGENX SE produced more free cash flow last quarter ($322.4M vs $-81.6M).
AbbVie Inc. is an American pharmaceutical company headquartered in North Chicago, Illinois. They have produced drugs to treat a wide range of medical issues.
Ulta Beauty, Inc., formerly known as Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance Inc. and before 2000 as Ulta3, is an American chain of cosmetic stores headquartered in Bolingbrook, Illinois. Ulta Beauty carries both high- and low-end cosmetics, fragrances, nail products, bath and body products, beauty tools and haircare products. Each location has a beauty salon available to the public.
ARGX vs ULTA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.5B | $2.9B |
| Net Profit | $877.2M | $230.9M |
| Gross Margin | 89.5% | 40.4% |
| Operating Margin | 28.9% | 10.8% |
| Net Margin | 35.5% | 8.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 83.2% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1.3% | -4.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $13.25 | $5.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $901.9M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | $877.2M | $230.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $260.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $414.8M | $305.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $865.6M | $242.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $252.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-32.5M | $313.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $394.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $249.5M |
| Q4 25 | 89.5% | 40.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 89.2% | 39.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.2% | 39.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 89.4% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 39.9% |
| Q4 25 | 28.9% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.2% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -15.4% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 13.1% |
| Q4 25 | 35.5% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | 10.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 64.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 10.0% |
| Q4 25 | $13.25 | $5.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.32 | $6.70 | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.33 | $5.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.55 | $6.47 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.06 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $5.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.5B | $204.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.3B | $2.6B |
| Total Assets | $8.7B | $7.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $204.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $242.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $454.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $177.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $414.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $524.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $766.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $121.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $8.7B | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.2B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $5.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $323.3M | $5.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $322.4M | $-81.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.0% | -2.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.37× | 0.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $594.5M | $-92.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $323.3M | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $96.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $361.8M | $220.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.9M | $-56.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $199.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-124.7M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-70.8M |
| Q4 25 | $322.4M | $-81.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $356.6M | $141.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.9M | $-171.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $104.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-125.5M | $68.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $994.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-177.1M |
| Q4 25 | 13.0% | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | -6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -7.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 4.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.37× | 0.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.87× | 0.72× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.05× | -0.23× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.84× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -0.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
