vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Armour Residential REIT, Inc. (ARR) and IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. (ITP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Armour Residential REIT, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($50.4M vs $25.6M, roughly 2.0× IT TECH PACKAGING, INC.). Armour Residential REIT, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 420.2% vs -5.7%, a 425.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Armour Residential REIT, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (297.9% vs 2.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Armour Residential REIT, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (108.0% CAGR vs 10.5%).
Armour Residential REIT, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust that primarily invests in agency residential mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities. It focuses on generating consistent long-term net income for shareholders via strategic asset management and active interest rate risk mitigation.
IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. is a paper manufacturing enterprise primarily operating in China. It produces and distributes a diverse portfolio of paper products including corrugated packaging paper, boxboard, and printing-use cultural paper, serving sectors such as consumer goods packaging, logistics, and commercial printing across its core market.
ARR vs ITP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $50.4M | $25.6M |
| Net Profit | $211.7M | $-1.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 7.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -3.9% |
| Net Margin | 420.2% | -5.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 297.9% | 2.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 555.9% | 26.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.43 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $50.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.5M | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.3M | $10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.7M | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0M | $26.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.9M |
| Q4 25 | $211.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.3M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-75.6M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.3M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-46.4M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-48.4M | $-77.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -31.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -21.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -51.0% |
| Q4 25 | 420.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 413.5% | -5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -228.4% | -7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 75.2% | -32.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -366.8% | -22.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -693.8% | -0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -54.6% |
| Q4 25 | $2.43 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.49 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.94 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.32 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.91 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.05 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $63.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $152.0M |
| Total Assets | $21.0B | $175.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.03× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $152.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $152.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $152.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $156.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $164.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $163.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $164.3M |
| Q4 25 | $21.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.4B | $175.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.2B | $175.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5B | $175.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.5B | $177.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $190.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.1B | $191.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $177.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.07× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $124.2M | $1.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.59× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $3.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-37.8M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.0M | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $101.5M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $261.5M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.1M | $721.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $624.4K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $668.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $615.4K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -22.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.24× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
