vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amer Sports, Inc. (AS) and BrilliA Inc (BRIA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amer Sports, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $23.5M, roughly 44.7× BrilliA Inc).
Amer Sports, Inc. is a Finnish multinational sporting equipment division based in Helsinki, Finland. Established in 1950 as an industrial conglomerate with interests as diverse as tobacco trading, ship owning and publishing, Amer has gradually evolved into a multinational firm devoted to the production and marketing of sporting goods. The company employs over 9,700 people. Since 2018, Amer has been a subsidiary of Chinese retail conglomerate Anta Sports.
BrilliA Inc is a digital mental health service provider that delivers accessible online counseling, psychiatric consultation, and personalized mental wellness solutions. Its primary operating market is North America, with ongoing expansion into select Asia-Pacific regions, serving both individual consumers and enterprise client segments.
AS vs BRIA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2024 vs Q3 2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $23.5M |
| Net Profit | $19.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | 52.8% | 18.0% |
| Operating Margin | 12.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 24 | — | $23.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $1.3B | — |
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-95.0M | — |
| Q3 24 | — | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 52.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 51.9% | — |
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -7.2% | — |
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-0.11 | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $114.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.02× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $114.3M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $199.0M | — |
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $92.2M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $75.4M | — |
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 5.7% | — |
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 9.4% | — |
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.02× | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AS
| Americas2 | $409.6M | 39% |
| EMEA1 | $356.9M | 34% |
| Greater China3 | $205.6M | 20% |
| Asia Pacific4 | $78.2M | 7% |
BRIA
Segment breakdown not available.
