vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AdvanSix Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($359.9M vs $268.0M, roughly 1.3× Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd). Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd runs the higher net margin — 30.8% vs -0.8%, a 31.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (272.1% vs 9.4%). Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($38.5M vs $36.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd's revenue compounded faster (124.8% CAGR vs 3.4%).
AdvanSix Inc. is an American chemical company that produces nylon 6 and related chemicals such as caprolactam and ammonium sulfate fertilizers. It operated as Honeywell's Resins and Chemicals division until 2016, when it was spun off as a separate company. The unit accounted for 3 percent of Honeywell's sales at the time. For 2019, revenue is estimated at $1.4 billion. The company traces its lineage to the H. W. Jayne Company, established 1884 in Frankford, Pennsylvania.
Seiko Group is a corporate group composed of Seiko Group Corporation and its subsidiaries and affiliates. It used to be recognized as a corporate group consisting of three core companies Seiko Holdings Corp., Seiko Instruments Inc., and Seiko Epson Corp. The three companies were linked by a common thread of timepiece technology. Although Epson still develops and manufactures wristwatches for the Seiko Group, Epson and its subsidiaries are not considered part of the group.
ASIX vs CRDO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $359.9M | $268.0M |
| Net Profit | $-2.8M | $82.6M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | 67.5% |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | 29.4% |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | 30.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | 272.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -892.9% | 2055.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $359.9M | $268.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.5M | $223.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $170.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $377.8M | $135.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.1M | $72.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.2M | $59.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $453.5M | $60.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $336.8M | $53.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | $82.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $63.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4M | $36.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $29.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.0K | $-4.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | $-10.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.4M | $428.0K |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 67.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 67.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | 67.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 63.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 63.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 62.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | 65.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 61.4% |
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | 29.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 27.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 19.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 19.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | -11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | -24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | -13.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.0% | -11.1% |
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | -5.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | -16.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | -17.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.2% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.15 | $0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.86 | $0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.43 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.65 | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | $813.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $815.2M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $813.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $479.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $431.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | $379.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.6M | $383.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | $398.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $410.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.6M | $409.1M |
| Q4 25 | $815.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $818.2M | $781.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $823.7M | $681.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.4M | $618.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $774.6M | $567.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $766.4M | $553.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $746.6M | $540.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $713.2M | $534.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $905.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $809.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $719.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $638.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $601.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $592.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.7M | $61.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.1M | $38.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.0% | 14.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.7% | 8.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.75× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.4M | $143.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | $61.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | $54.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $57.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.2M | $10.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.2M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.2M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | $36.1M | $38.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0K | $51.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $54.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | $-383.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $962.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-71.6M | $-6.1M |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | 14.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 23.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 31.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | -0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | -16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | -21.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.3% | -11.6% |
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.5% | 9.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | 1.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.49× | 0.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | 182.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASIX
| Plant Nutrients | $140.0M | 39% |
| Chemical Intermediates | $92.8M | 26% |
| Caprolactam | $64.4M | 18% |
| Nylon Resins | $62.8M | 17% |
CRDO
| Other | $132.1M | 49% |
| HK | $104.4M | 39% |
| RESTOFTHEWORLD | $31.5M | 12% |
