vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) and Forestar Group Inc. (FOR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AdvanSix Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($359.9M vs $273.0M, roughly 1.3× Forestar Group Inc.). Forestar Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.6% vs -0.8%, a 6.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AdvanSix Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.4% vs 9.0%). AdvanSix Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($36.1M vs $-157.1M). Over the past eight quarters, AdvanSix Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (3.4% CAGR vs -9.6%).
AdvanSix Inc. is an American chemical company that produces nylon 6 and related chemicals such as caprolactam and ammonium sulfate fertilizers. It operated as Honeywell's Resins and Chemicals division until 2016, when it was spun off as a separate company. The unit accounted for 3 percent of Honeywell's sales at the time. For 2019, revenue is estimated at $1.4 billion. The company traces its lineage to the H. W. Jayne Company, established 1884 in Frankford, Pennsylvania.
Forestar Group Inc. is a residential lot development company based in Arlington, Texas. The company has operations in 51 markets in 21 states and delivered 11,518 residential lots during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2020. The company is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange and in October 2017 became a majority-owned subsidiary of D.R. Horton, Inc., the largest homebuilder by volume in the United States since 2002. The company primarily acquires entitled real estate and...
ASIX vs FOR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $359.9M | $273.0M |
| Net Profit | $-2.8M | $15.4M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | 20.1% |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | 7.6% |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | 5.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | 9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -892.9% | -6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $359.9M | $273.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.5M | $670.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $390.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $377.8M | $351.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.1M | $250.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.2M | $551.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $453.5M | $318.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $336.8M | $333.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | $15.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $86.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4M | $32.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $31.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.0K | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $81.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | $38.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.4M | $45.0M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 22.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | 22.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 24.9% |
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 11.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 16.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.0% | 17.6% |
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.2% | 13.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $1.70 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.15 | $0.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.86 | $0.62 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $0.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $1.59 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.43 | $0.76 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.65 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | $211.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $793.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $815.2M | $1.8B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.44× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $211.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $379.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $189.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | $174.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.6M | $132.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | $481.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $359.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.6M | $416.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $793.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $802.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $872.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $872.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $806.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $706.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $706.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $705.7M |
| Q4 25 | $815.2M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $818.2M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $823.7M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $774.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $766.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $746.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $713.2M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.48× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.7M | $-157.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.1M | $-157.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.0% | -57.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.7% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -10.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.4M | $93.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | $-157.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | $256.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $-19.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.2M | $-450.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3M | $119.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.2M | $-61.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.2M | $-59.2M |
| Q4 25 | $36.1M | $-157.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0K | $255.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | $-20.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $118.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $-62.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-71.6M | $-59.8M |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | -57.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 38.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | -19.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.3% | -17.9% |
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.5% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -10.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | 0.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.49× | -0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 182.29× | -27.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | 1.46× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | -1.59× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASIX
| Plant Nutrients | $140.0M | 39% |
| Chemical Intermediates | $92.8M | 26% |
| Caprolactam | $64.4M | 18% |
| Nylon Resins | $62.8M | 17% |
FOR
| D.R.Horton Inc. | $183.8M | 67% |
| Other | $89.2M | 33% |
