vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) and Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kontoor Brands, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($613.3M vs $359.9M, roughly 1.7× AdvanSix Inc.). Kontoor Brands, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 15.1% vs -0.8%, a 15.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kontoor Brands, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (45.0% vs 9.4%). Over the past eight quarters, AdvanSix Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (3.4% CAGR vs -1.4%).
AdvanSix Inc. is an American chemical company that produces nylon 6 and related chemicals such as caprolactam and ammonium sulfate fertilizers. It operated as Honeywell's Resins and Chemicals division until 2016, when it was spun off as a separate company. The unit accounted for 3 percent of Honeywell's sales at the time. For 2019, revenue is estimated at $1.4 billion. The company traces its lineage to the H. W. Jayne Company, established 1884 in Frankford, Pennsylvania.
Kontoor Brands is an American clothing company. It was a spin off from the VF Corporation in May 2019, and markets clothing under the Lee, Wrangler and Helly Hansen brand names.
ASIX vs KTB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $359.9M | $613.3M |
| Net Profit | $-2.8M | $92.4M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | 53.7% |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | 14.7% |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | 15.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | 45.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -892.9% | 116.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $1.65 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $613.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $359.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.5M | $853.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $658.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $377.8M | $622.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.1M | $699.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.2M | $670.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $453.5M | $606.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $92.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $36.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4M | $73.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $42.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.0K | $64.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $70.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | $51.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 53.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | 46.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 47.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 43.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 44.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | 44.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 11.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 12.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 8.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.65 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $0.66 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.15 | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.86 | $0.76 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $1.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.43 | $0.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | $56.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $815.2M | $618.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.85× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $56.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $82.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $107.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | $356.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.6M | $334.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | $269.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $224.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $735.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $740.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $745.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $749.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $618.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $815.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $818.2M | $529.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $823.7M | $498.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.4M | $426.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $774.6M | $400.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $766.4M | $356.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $746.6M | $367.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.53× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.04× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | $64.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $25.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.2M | $82.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3M | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.2M | $96.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0K | $55.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $22.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | $74.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $75.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $129.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $92.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | 12.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 15.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | 0.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.49× | 1.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | 182.29× | 1.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | 1.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | 1.86× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASIX
| Plant Nutrients | $140.0M | 39% |
| Chemical Intermediates | $92.8M | 26% |
| Caprolactam | $64.4M | 18% |
| Nylon Resins | $62.8M | 17% |
KTB
| Wrangler U.S | $373.7M | 61% |
| Helly Hansen International | $129.3M | 21% |
| Wrangler International | $62.1M | 10% |
| Helly Hansen U.S | $36.2M | 6% |
| Global Other | $12.0M | 2% |
