vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB) and OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kontoor Brands, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($853.2M vs $307.3M, roughly 2.8× OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC). Kontoor Brands, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs -20.7%, a 25.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kontoor Brands, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.3% vs -0.2%). Kontoor Brands, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($55.8M vs $-47.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Kontoor Brands, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (14.2% CAGR vs -0.1%).
Kontoor Brands is an American clothing company. It was a spin off from the VF Corporation in May 2019, and markets clothing under the Lee, Wrangler and Helly Hansen brand names.
Oxford Industries, Inc. is a publicly traded clothing company in the United States that specializes in high-end clothing and apparel. The company carries many major labels, including Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, Johnny Was and Southern Tide.
KTB vs OXM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q3 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $853.2M | $307.3M |
| Net Profit | $36.9M | $-63.7M |
| Gross Margin | 41.3% | 60.3% |
| Operating Margin | 7.5% | -27.7% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | -20.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 27.3% | -0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -47.6% | -1517.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.66 | $-4.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $307.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $853.2M | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $658.3M | $392.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $622.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $699.3M | $308.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $670.2M | $419.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $606.9M | $398.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $631.2M | $404.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-63.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.9M | $16.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.9M | $26.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.0M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.5M | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.8M | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.5M | $-60.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 60.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.3% | 61.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.3% | 64.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.7% | 63.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.7% | 63.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.7% | 64.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.2% | 60.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -27.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.1% | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.4% | -20.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.4% | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.66 | $1.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.32 | $1.70 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.76 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.13 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.26 | $2.57 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.92 | $2.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.05 | $-3.72 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $82.4M | $8.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $529.6M | $528.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.53× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.4M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.5M | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $356.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.1M | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $269.4M | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $224.3M | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $215.1M | $7.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $735.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $745.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $749.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $779.2M | $29.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $528.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $529.6M | $597.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $498.3M | $592.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $426.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $400.1M | $612.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $356.9M | $621.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $367.2M | $592.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $387.2M | $560.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.74× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.09× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.04× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.01× | 0.05× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $64.1M | $-9.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $55.8M | $-47.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.5% | -15.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | 12.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.74× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $228.0M | $-79.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-9.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.1M | $83.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.6M | $88.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.2M | $32.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.5M | $74.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-47.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.8M | $52.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.4M | $-27.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.9M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.6M | $21.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.0M | $55.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | -15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.5% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | -7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.4% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.3% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.2% | 13.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.74× | 5.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | -0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.81× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 2.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.86× | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.95× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KTB
| International Member | $292.0M | 34% |
| CTC Triangle B.V | $192.7M | 23% |
| Lee Segment | $186.7M | 22% |
| Helly Hansen Segment | $185.9M | 22% |
OXM
| Sales Channel Retail | $162.9M | 53% |
| Sales Channel Wholesale | $61.3M | 20% |
| Johnny Was | $45.4M | 15% |
| Sales Channel Food And Beverage | $29.3M | 10% |
| Other Foreign Countries | $9.0M | 3% |
