vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASSEMBLY BIOSCIENCES, INC. (ASMB) and Avidity Biosciences, Inc. (RNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Avidity Biosciences, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($12.5M vs $10.8M, roughly 1.2× ASSEMBLY BIOSCIENCES, INC.). ASSEMBLY BIOSCIENCES, INC. runs the higher net margin — -85.2% vs -1398.3%, a 1313.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Avidity Biosciences, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (434.0% vs 57.6%). ASSEMBLY BIOSCIENCES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-15.2M vs $-156.9M).
Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. is an American biotechnology company founded in 2004 that develops and manufactures systems for gene sequencing and some novel real time biological observation. PacBio has two principal sequencing platforms: single-molecule real-time sequencing (SMRT), based on the properties of zero-mode waveguides and sequencing by binding (SBB) chemistry, which uses native nucleotides and scarless incorporation for DNA binding and extension.
Eli Lilly and Company, doing business as Lilly, is an American multinational pharmaceutical company headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana, with offices in 18 countries. Its products are sold in approximately 125 countries. The company was founded in 1876 by Eli Lilly, a pharmaceutical chemist and Union army veteran during the American Civil War for whom the company was later named.
ASMB vs RNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $10.8M | $12.5M |
| Net Profit | $-9.2M | $-174.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -100.9% | -1513.5% |
| Net Margin | -85.2% | -1398.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 57.6% | 434.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4.3% | -117.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.72 | $-1.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $10.8M | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.6M | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.4M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.8M | $3.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $2.2M |
| Q3 25 | $-9.2M | $-174.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | $-157.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.8M | $-115.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-102.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.6M | $-80.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-11.2M | $-70.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.1M | $-68.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-60.4M |
| Q3 25 | -100.9% | -1513.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -115.2% | -4448.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -105.5% | -8360.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -4069.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -160.1% | -4200.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -143.0% | -4040.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -185.5% | -2178.6% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -3043.5% |
| Q3 25 | -85.2% | -1398.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -105.9% | -4089.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -93.6% | -7360.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3439.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -140.4% | -3441.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -130.7% | -3461.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -156.9% | -1943.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -2756.2% |
| Q3 25 | $-0.72 | $-1.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.33 | $-1.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.17 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.51 | $-0.65 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.98 | $-0.65 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.66 | $-0.79 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-0.80 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $22.5M | $350.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $182.7M | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $240.0M | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $22.5M | $350.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.0M | $243.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.4M | $254.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.3M | $219.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.5M | $370.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.2M | $575.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.7M | $471.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $185.1M |
| Q3 25 | $182.7M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.6M | $830.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $500.8M |
| Q3 25 | $240.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $119.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $100.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $115.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $119.9M | $951.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $628.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-15.1M | $-156.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-15.2M | $-156.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -140.7% | -1257.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 5.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-592.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-15.1M | $-156.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.8M | $-199.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.4M | $-124.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-51.1M | $-99.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.2M | $-65.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-17.1M | $-65.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.4M | $-70.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $16.5M |
| Q3 25 | $-15.2M | $-156.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-203.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-128.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-51.1M | $-103.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-67.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-17.1M | $-65.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.4M | $-71.3M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $15.6M |
| Q3 25 | -140.7% | -1257.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -5277.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8174.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -695.2% | -3491.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2881.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -200.6% | -3204.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -317.7% | -2012.3% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 713.1% |
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 86.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 238.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 131.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 72.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 26.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 25.8% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 39.4% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
