vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Academy Sports & Outdoors, Inc. (ASO) and Gen Digital (GEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Academy Sports & Outdoors, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.1× Gen Digital). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs 5.2%, a 10.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs 3.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Gen Digital's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs -12.2%).
Academy Sports + Outdoors is an American sporting-goods store chain with corporate offices in the Katy Distribution Center in unincorporated western Harris County, Texas, United States, near Katy and west of Houston. For 74 years, it was a privately held company owned by the Gochman family, until its May 2011 acquisition by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts. In October 2020, it was listed on NASDAQ.
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
ASO vs GEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $71.6M | $192.0M |
| Gross Margin | 35.7% | 78.4% |
| Operating Margin | 7.3% | 34.9% |
| Net Margin | 5.2% | 15.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.0% | 28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 8.8% | 6.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.05 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $986.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $974.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $965.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $192.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $71.6M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $125.4M | $135.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $133.6M | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.8M | $159.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.6M | $161.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.5M | $181.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.7% | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.0% | 78.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.2% | 80.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.0% | 80.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.1% | 80.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.4% | 80.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.3% | 35.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.8% | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.2% | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.8% | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | 43.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.8% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.0% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.2% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 18.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.05 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.85 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.68 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.85 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.92 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.95 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.01 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $289.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $8.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.1B | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $15.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $289.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $300.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $285.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $296.0M | $883.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $324.6M | $737.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $378.1M | $644.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $16.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $16.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9B | $15.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $15.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.33× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-13.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.68× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $191.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $49.0M | $541.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.6M | $409.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $157.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $140.2M | $473.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.9M | $326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.3M | $158.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $199.7M | $264.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-13.6M | $535.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.8M | $405.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.4M | $470.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.4M | $318.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.1M | $156.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $167.4M | $262.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.0% | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | 46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 16.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.3% | 27.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.68× | 4.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.63× | 3.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.42× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | 3.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.47× | 2.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.61× | 1.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASO
| Outdoors | $445.1M | 32% |
| Apparel | $349.8M | 25% |
| Footwear | $292.4M | 21% |
| Sports And Recreation | $288.7M | 21% |
| Other | $7.6M | 1% |
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
