vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (ASTI) and VivoSim Labs, INC. (VIVS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
VivoSim Labs, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.0K vs $15.6K, roughly 1.7× Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.). Over the past eight quarters, Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (67.1% CAGR vs -5.3%).
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. is a publicly traded photovoltaic (PV) company located in Thornton, Colorado. Its primary product is a flexible CIGS solar cell on a plastic substrate.
VivoSim Labs, Inc. is a preclinical biotechnology company that develops advanced human organ and tissue simulation platforms. Its products are used by pharmaceutical firms, contract research organizations, and academic institutions to evaluate drug safety, efficacy, and toxicity, reducing reliance on traditional animal testing in global life sciences research segments.
ASTI vs VIVS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.6K | $26.0K |
| Net Profit | — | $-2.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -10576.9% |
| Net Margin | — | -10350.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 8.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -42.3% | 21.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-1.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $15.6K | $26.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.5K | $28.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.0K | $37.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.6K | $51.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $24.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6K | $30.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.7K | $39.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6K | $29.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.0M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.1M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.5M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.7M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.5M | $-3.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 91.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 96.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 94.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -10576.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6892.3% | -9410.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12316.8% | -7878.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11177.9% | -6184.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -14450.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -26443.2% | -8693.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8490.7% | -8682.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -44206.0% | -10675.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -10350.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7081.3% | -9089.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12177.3% | -7683.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10716.2% | 13435.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -14362.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19776.2% | -8496.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12420.5% | -8574.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -45316.8% | -10500.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.62 | $-0.98 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.17 | $-1.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.13 | $5.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.75 | $-2.28 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.37 | $-1.68 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.76 | $-2.74 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-53.00 | $-17.93 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.8M | $4.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.3M | $4.4M |
| Total Assets | $6.3M | $7.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.8M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1M | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0M | $9.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $11.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8M | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $187.5K | $2.9M |
| Q4 25 | $3.3M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6M | $10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4M | $364.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.3M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2M | $6.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.6M | $3.6M |
| Q4 25 | $6.3M | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.8M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2M | $14.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1M | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $6.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | $6.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-6.9M | $-2.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-6.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -44350.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 204.7% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-12.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.8M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.5M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.6M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -44350.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -6182.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -10692.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -9923.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -8850.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 204.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 103.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
