vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd (ATAT) and Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($789.6M vs $721.6M, roughly 1.1× Celsius Holdings, Inc.). Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — 17.6% vs 3.4%, a 14.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (252.5% vs 117.2%). Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($210.7M vs $-130.0M).
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd is a leading China-based hospitality and lifestyle enterprise. It operates a wide portfolio of mid-to-premium hotel brands for business and leisure travelers, and offers complementary lifestyle retail products and experience services, catering primarily to middle-class consumers across domestic and selected overseas markets.
Celsius Holdings, Inc. is an American company that produces a range of fitness and energy drinks under the brand name Celsius. The company's products are marketed as healthy, to which the CEO attributes the brand's success.
ATAT vs CELH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $789.6M | $721.6M |
| Net Profit | $139.1M | $24.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 47.4% |
| Operating Margin | 22.5% | 3.6% |
| Net Margin | 17.6% | 3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 252.5% | 117.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 322.2% | 231.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $721.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $789.6M | $725.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $739.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $329.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $332.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $224.0M | $265.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $402.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $203.4M | $355.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $24.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.1M | $-61.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $99.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $44.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.0M | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $79.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.6M | $77.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 47.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 51.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 52.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 50.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 46.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 51.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.5% | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | -1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.1% | 23.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.6% | -8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.5% | 21.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.09 | $0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $669.2M | $398.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $676.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $405.0M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.57× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $398.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $669.2M | $806.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $615.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $977.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $890.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.0M | $903.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $903.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $520.7M | $879.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $676.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $870.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $871.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $277.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $405.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $443.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $399.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $291.3M | $423.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $415.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $323.5M | $338.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $927.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $936.3M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $216.6M | $-119.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $210.7M | $-130.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.7% | -18.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.56× | -4.83× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $359.6M | $323.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-119.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.6M | $331.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $43.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $103.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $75.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.8M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $39.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.8M | $134.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-130.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $210.7M | $321.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $35.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $96.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $70.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.3M | $8.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.1M | $130.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.7% | 44.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | 36.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -4.83× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | 2.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.56× | 1.73× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.