vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aterian, Inc. (ATER) and AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC (AUBN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Aterian, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($15.1M vs $8.5M, roughly 1.8× AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC). AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC runs the higher net margin — 19.7% vs -52.5%, a 72.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.4% vs -38.5%). AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($10.9M vs $-1.0M). Over the past eight quarters, AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC's revenue compounded faster (5.9% CAGR vs -13.5%).
Aterian, Inc. is a technology-enabled consumer products company that leverages artificial intelligence and data analytics to identify market demand, develop, source and distribute a wide portfolio of affordable goods spanning home improvement, wellness, personal care, pet supplies and outdoor recreation. It primarily sells its products through leading global e-commerce platforms, with core markets covering North America and Europe.
Auburn Bank is an American community bank providing services in the East of Alabama as a state registered bank. The Bank offers financial products and services including checking, savings, and lending. The bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. Its operation is regulated by the Alabama Superintendent of Banks.
ATER vs AUBN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.1M | $8.5M |
| Net Profit | $-7.9M | $1.7M |
| Gross Margin | 56.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -51.1% | 25.1% |
| Net Margin | -52.5% | 19.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -38.5% | 8.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -512.2% | 6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.0M | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.5M | $8.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4M | $7.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.6M | $7.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.2M | $7.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.2M | $7.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.9M | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.3M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.9M | $1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.8M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.6M | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.2M | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | 56.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 65.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -51.1% | 25.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.7% | 33.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.1% | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | 24.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.5% | 30.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.6% | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.5% | 29.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -26.1% | 20.3% |
| Q4 25 | -52.5% | 19.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.0% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -25.0% | 22.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -25.4% | 19.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.3% | 20.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.8% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.0% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -25.5% | 18.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.64 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.50 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $15.2M | $92.1M |
| Total Assets | $29.6M | $1.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $15.2M | $92.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | $89.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.3M | $86.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.0M | $83.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.0M | $78.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.6M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $75.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.0M | $74.5M |
| Q4 25 | $29.6M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.8M | $996.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.5M | $977.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.1M | $990.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $979.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.0M | $12.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.0M | $10.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.9% | 128.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 17.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 7.42× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.0M | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.4M | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.0K | $10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-722.0K | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0K | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.0M | $10.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-42.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | -6.9% | 128.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 111.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 26.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.76× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATER
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $13.1M | 87% |
| Heating Cooling And Air Quality | $2.1M | 14% |
AUBN
Segment breakdown not available.
