vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aterian, Inc. (ATER) and CRYO CELL INTERNATIONAL INC (CCEL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Aterian, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($15.1M vs $7.8M, roughly 1.9× CRYO CELL INTERNATIONAL INC). CRYO CELL INTERNATIONAL INC runs the higher net margin — -48.7% vs -52.5%, a 3.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CRYO CELL INTERNATIONAL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.3% vs -38.5%). CRYO CELL INTERNATIONAL INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.2M vs $-1.0M). Over the past eight quarters, CRYO CELL INTERNATIONAL INC's revenue compounded faster (-0.1% CAGR vs -13.5%).
Aterian, Inc. is a technology-enabled consumer products company that leverages artificial intelligence and data analytics to identify market demand, develop, source and distribute a wide portfolio of affordable goods spanning home improvement, wellness, personal care, pet supplies and outdoor recreation. It primarily sells its products through leading global e-commerce platforms, with core markets covering North America and Europe.
Cryo-Cell International, Inc. is a cord blood bank. It was founded by Dan Richard in 1989. Cryo-Cell International is the first private cord blood bank to separate and store stem cells. Cryo-Cell is headquartered outside of Tampa, in Oldsmar, Florida. In January 1997, the Company's stock began trading on the NASDAQ Small Cap market under symbol CCEL.
ATER vs CCEL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.1M | $7.8M |
| Net Profit | $-7.9M | $-3.8M |
| Gross Margin | 56.1% | 77.9% |
| Operating Margin | -51.1% | -50.6% |
| Net Margin | -52.5% | -48.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -38.5% | -2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -512.2% | -105.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.46 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $7.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.0M | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.5M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4M | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.6M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.2M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.2M | $7.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.9M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.3M | $749.4K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.9M | $355.8K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $282.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.8M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.6M | $655.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.2M | $556.2K |
| Q4 25 | 56.1% | 77.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.1% | 77.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.3% | 76.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.4% | 75.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.4% | 78.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.3% | 73.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.4% | 74.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 65.1% | 73.7% |
| Q4 25 | -51.1% | -50.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.7% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.1% | 18.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.5% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.6% | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.5% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -26.1% | 10.5% |
| Q4 25 | -52.5% | -48.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -25.0% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -25.4% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.3% | -23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.8% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.0% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -25.5% | 7.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.9M | $3.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $8.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $15.2M | $-18.6M |
| Total Assets | $29.6M | $61.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.9M | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.6M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5M | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.3M | $3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.0M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.1M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5M | $979.6K |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | $15.2M | $-18.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | $-14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.3M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.0M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.0M | $-13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.6M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $-10.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.0M | $-10.3M |
| Q4 25 | $29.6M | $61.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.1M | $63.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.4M | $64.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.8M | $64.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.5M | $64.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.1M | $62.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.9M | $62.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $61.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.0M | $1.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.0M | $1.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.9% | 15.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $5.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.0M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.4M | $707.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $954.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.0K | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-722.0K | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $1.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0K | $-356.9K |
| Q4 25 | $-1.0M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.4M | $644.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $892.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $21.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-42.0K | $-814.6K |
| Q4 25 | -6.9% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.4% | 31.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.7% | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.2% | -10.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.38× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.99× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.64× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATER
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $13.1M | 87% |
| Heating Cooling And Air Quality | $2.1M | 14% |
CCEL
Segment breakdown not available.
