vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aterian, Inc. (ATER) and FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP (FSP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.0M vs $15.1M, roughly 1.7× Aterian, Inc.). FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP runs the higher net margin — -28.1% vs -52.5%, a 24.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-8.2% vs -38.5%). Aterian, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.0M vs $-12.7M). Over the past eight quarters, FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP's revenue compounded faster (-8.7% CAGR vs -13.5%).
Aterian, Inc. is a technology-enabled consumer products company that leverages artificial intelligence and data analytics to identify market demand, develop, source and distribute a wide portfolio of affordable goods spanning home improvement, wellness, personal care, pet supplies and outdoor recreation. It primarily sells its products through leading global e-commerce platforms, with core markets covering North America and Europe.
Franklin Street Properties Corp is a Massachusetts-based real estate investment trust (REIT) in the United States. It primarily invests in, owns, and operates high-quality office properties across major U.S. metropolitan markets, serving corporate tenants across various industry segments, and delivers stable long-term returns via rental income and strategic asset management.
ATER vs FSP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.1M | $26.0M |
| Net Profit | $-7.9M | $-7.3M |
| Gross Margin | 56.1% | 59.4% |
| Operating Margin | -51.1% | -27.9% |
| Net Margin | -52.5% | -28.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -38.5% | -8.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -512.2% | 14.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.0M | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.5M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4M | $27.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.6M | $28.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.2M | $29.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.2M | $31.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.9M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.3M | $-8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.9M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.8M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.6M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.2M | $-7.6M |
| Q4 25 | 56.1% | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.1% | 60.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.3% | 59.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.4% | 62.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.4% | 59.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.3% | 61.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.4% | 64.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 65.1% | 64.7% |
| Q4 25 | -51.1% | -27.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.7% | -30.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.1% | -29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | -78.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.5% | -29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.6% | -52.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.5% | -68.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -26.1% | -24.0% |
| Q4 25 | -52.5% | -28.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.0% | -30.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -25.0% | -29.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -25.4% | -79.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.3% | -30.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.8% | -52.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.0% | -68.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -25.5% | -24.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.9M | $30.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $15.2M | $607.0M |
| Total Assets | $29.6M | $892.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.9M | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.6M | $31.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5M | $29.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.3M | $30.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.0M | $41.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.1M | $40.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | $30.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5M | $34.2M |
| Q4 25 | $15.2M | $607.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | $615.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.3M | $624.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.0M | $633.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.0M | $655.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.6M | $665.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $682.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.0M | $703.9M |
| Q4 25 | $29.6M | $892.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.1M | $901.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.4M | $903.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.8M | $916.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.5M | $946.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.1M | $981.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $1.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.0M | $3.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.0M | $-12.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.9% | -48.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 63.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-25.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.0M | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.4M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.0K | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-722.0K | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $-648.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0K | $-7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.0M | $-12.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.4M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-9.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-16.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-42.0K | $-15.8M |
| Q4 25 | -6.9% | -48.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.4% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.7% | -21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -36.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -57.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.3% | -16.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.2% | -50.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 63.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 88.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 28.1% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATER
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $13.1M | 87% |
| Heating Cooling And Air Quality | $2.1M | 14% |
FSP
Segment breakdown not available.
