vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aterian, Inc. (ATER) and Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. (IDR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Aterian, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($15.1M vs $14.6M, roughly 1.0× Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 64.3% vs -52.5%, a 116.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (92.0% vs -38.5%). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.2M vs $-1.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (57.2% CAGR vs -13.5%).
Aterian, Inc. is a technology-enabled consumer products company that leverages artificial intelligence and data analytics to identify market demand, develop, source and distribute a wide portfolio of affordable goods spanning home improvement, wellness, personal care, pet supplies and outdoor recreation. It primarily sells its products through leading global e-commerce platforms, with core markets covering North America and Europe.
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.IDREarnings & Financial Report
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based natural resource company focused on the exploration, development, and production of critical and strategic minerals. Primarily operating in Idaho, it targets rare earth elements, gold, silver, and other high-demand minerals, supplying products to the clean energy, defense, and industrial manufacturing sectors across North America.
ATER vs IDR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.1M | $14.6M |
| Net Profit | $-7.9M | $9.4M |
| Gross Margin | 56.1% | 68.5% |
| Operating Margin | -51.1% | 62.4% |
| Net Margin | -52.5% | 64.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -38.5% | 92.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -512.2% | 220.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.0M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.5M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4M | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.6M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.2M | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0M | $6.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.2M | $5.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.9M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.3M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.9M | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.8M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.6M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.2M | $2.2M |
| Q4 25 | 56.1% | 68.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.1% | 63.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.3% | 57.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.4% | 50.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.4% | 53.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.3% | 48.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.4% | 50.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 65.1% | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | -51.1% | 62.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.7% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.1% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.5% | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.6% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.5% | 34.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -26.1% | 36.3% |
| Q4 25 | -52.5% | 64.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.0% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -25.0% | 29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -25.4% | 22.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.3% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.8% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.0% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -25.5% | 36.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $15.2M | $108.2M |
| Total Assets | $29.6M | $116.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.02× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5M | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | $15.2M | $108.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | $74.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.3M | $49.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.0M | $39.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.0M | $37.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.6M | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $25.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.0M | $21.6M |
| Q4 25 | $29.6M | $116.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.1M | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.4M | $57.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.8M | $48.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.5M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.1M | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.9M | $32.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $28.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.15× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.0M | $10.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.0M | $8.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.9% | 56.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 17.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $12.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.0M | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.4M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.0K | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-722.0K | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0K | $2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.0M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | $709.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.4M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-42.0K | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | -6.9% | 56.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.4% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.7% | 26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.3% | 38.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.2% | 38.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 19.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.50× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.19× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATER
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $13.1M | 87% |
| Heating Cooling And Air Quality | $2.1M | 14% |
IDR
Segment breakdown not available.
