vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Adtalem Global Education Inc. (ATGE) and 17 Education & Technology Group Inc. (YQ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Adtalem Global Education Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($503.4M vs $387.9K, roughly 1297.7× 17 Education & Technology Group Inc.). Adtalem Global Education Inc. runs the higher net margin — 15.2% vs -222.4%, a 237.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Adtalem Global Education Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (10.4% CAGR vs -45.7%).
Adtalem Global Education Inc. is a US corporation based in Chicago, Illinois, that operates for-profit higher education institutions, including American University of the Caribbean School of Medicine, Chamberlain University, Ross University School of Medicine, Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, and Walden University.
McGraw Hill, Inc. is an American education science company that provides educational content, software, and services for students and educators across various levels—from K-12 to higher education and professional settings. They produce textbooks, digital learning tools, and adaptive technology to enhance learning experiences and outcomes. It is one of the "big three" educational publishers along with Houghton Mifflin Harcourt and Pearson Education. McGraw Hill also publishes reference and tra...
ATGE vs YQ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2026 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $503.4M | $387.9K |
| Net Profit | $76.4M | $-862.6K |
| Gross Margin | 59.2% | 51.2% |
| Operating Margin | 22.1% | -233.1% |
| Net Margin | 15.2% | -222.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 0.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.11 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $503.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $462.3M | $387.9K | ||
| Q2 25 | $457.1M | $489.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | $466.1M | $412.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $447.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $417.4M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $409.9M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $412.7M | $487.4K |
| Q4 25 | $76.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.8M | $-862.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.2M | $-499.8K | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.8M | $-588.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.2M | $-342.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.4M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.8M | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | 59.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.6% | 51.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.5% | 57.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 57.1% | 36.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.4% | 60.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.5% | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 57.5% | 38.4% |
| Q4 25 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.5% | -233.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | -112.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.4% | -156.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | -36.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.7% | -89.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.0% | -246.7% |
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | -222.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | -102.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.1% | -142.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.1% | -29.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | -82.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | -219.9% |
| Q4 25 | $2.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.67 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.43 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.59 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.98 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.18 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.23 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.93 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $56.3M | $33.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $504.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $6.5M |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $66.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.37× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $56.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $264.7M | $33.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.6M | $31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $219.0M | $37.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $264.8M | $38.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $219.3M | $48.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $179.8M | $37.9M |
| Q4 25 | $504.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $553.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $552.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $552.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $649.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $649.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $648.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $648.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $6.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $8.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $66.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $68.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $71.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $81.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $85.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.49× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $29.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $15.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.39× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $368.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $29.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $130.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $207.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-19.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $89.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $162.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $114.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-29.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $140.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.11× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.42× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.25× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.93× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.42× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATGE
| Walden University Segment | $217.6M | 43% |
| Chamberlain University Segment | $183.8M | 37% |
| Medical And Veterinary | $102.0M | 20% |
| Other Services | $1.6M | 0% |
YQ
Segment breakdown not available.