vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (LOPE) and 17 Education & Technology Group Inc. (YQ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Grand Canyon Education, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($308.1M vs $387.9K, roughly 794.3× 17 Education & Technology Group Inc.). Grand Canyon Education, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 28.1% vs -222.4%, a 250.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Grand Canyon Education, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5.9% CAGR vs -45.7%).
Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (GCE) is an American for-profit corporation that provides services to universities, specializing in program development, online education, and operational support. Formerly affiliated with Grand Canyon University (GCU), a Christian university in Arizona, GCE became a separate publicly traded company in 2008.
McGraw Hill, Inc. is an American education science company that provides educational content, software, and services for students and educators across various levels—from K-12 to higher education and professional settings. They produce textbooks, digital learning tools, and adaptive technology to enhance learning experiences and outcomes. It is one of the "big three" educational publishers along with Houghton Mifflin Harcourt and Pearson Education. McGraw Hill also publishes reference and tra...
LOPE vs YQ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $308.1M | $387.9K |
| Net Profit | $86.7M | $-862.6K |
| Gross Margin | — | 51.2% |
| Operating Margin | 35.1% | -233.1% |
| Net Margin | 28.1% | -222.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.13 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $308.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.1M | $387.9K | ||
| Q2 25 | $247.5M | $489.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | $289.3M | $412.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $292.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $238.3M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $227.5M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $274.7M | $487.4K |
| Q4 25 | $86.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.3M | $-862.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.5M | $-499.8K | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.6M | $-588.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.5M | $-342.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.9M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $68.0M | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 51.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 57.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 60.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.4% |
| Q4 25 | 35.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | -233.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.9% | -112.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.4% | -156.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.2% | -36.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.8% | -89.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.8% | -246.7% |
| Q4 25 | 28.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | -222.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | -102.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | -142.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.4% | -29.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.3% | -82.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | -219.9% |
| Q4 25 | $3.13 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.58 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.48 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.52 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.83 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.42 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.19 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.29 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $111.8M | $33.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $746.9M | $6.5M |
| Total Assets | $992.3M | $66.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $111.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $97.3M | $33.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $192.3M | $31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.5M | $37.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $324.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.6M | $38.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $241.3M | $48.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $196.2M | $37.9M |
| Q4 25 | $746.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $758.0M | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $778.0M | $6.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $780.7M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $783.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $764.1M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $759.2M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $759.4M | $8.8M |
| Q4 25 | $992.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $66.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $68.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $71.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $992.9M | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $992.7M | $81.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $85.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $130.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $122.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 39.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.50× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $238.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $130.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-48.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $124.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $67.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $135.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-29.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $122.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-58.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $126.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-39.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $76.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -22.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.99× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.98× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.66× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.71× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.83× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.25× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
