vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) and Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (CVGI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($446.6M vs $154.8M, roughly 2.9× Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.). On growth, Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.8% vs -5.2%). Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($31.2M vs $8.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (2.3% CAGR vs -10.8%).
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. designs, manufactures and distributes high-performance filtration products and tailored solutions. Its portfolio covers air, fuel, oil and hydraulic filtration systems, serving global automotive, heavy-duty vehicle, industrial equipment and aerospace end markets, for both original equipment manufacturers and aftermarket replacement customers.
WABCO Holdings, Inc. was a U.S.-based provider of electronic braking, stability, suspension and transmission automation systems for heavy-duty commercial vehicles. In 2007, the Vehicle Control Systems was spun off as WABCO Holdings Inc., an American provider of electronic braking, stability, suspension and transmission automation systems for heavy-duty commercial vehicles. Their products are present in many commercial vehicles such as trucks, buses, trailers and off-highway vehicles but they ...
ATMU vs CVGI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $446.6M | $154.8M |
| Net Profit | $48.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | 28.5% | 9.7% |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | -1.2% |
| Net Margin | 10.7% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 9.8% | -5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 19.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.58 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $446.6M | $154.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.7M | $152.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $453.5M | $172.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.5M | $169.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $406.7M | $163.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $403.7M | $171.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $193.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.6M | $194.6M |
| Q4 25 | $48.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.8M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.9M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8M | $9.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.2M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.5M | $2.9M |
| Q4 25 | 28.5% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.9% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.9% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.6% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.5% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.2% | 11.9% |
| Q4 25 | 15.8% | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.3% | -0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | -3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.1% | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | -4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.2% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | -2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.0% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.7% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.58 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.66 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.49 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.52 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.67 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.54 | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $236.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $570.0M | $104.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $378.5M | $133.4M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $391.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.51× | 0.79× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $236.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $190.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $183.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $184.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $196.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $149.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $570.0M | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $577.5M | $108.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $585.0M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $588.8M | $117.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.5M | $135.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.2M | $128.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $600.0M | $142.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $600.0M | $155.7M |
| Q4 25 | $378.5M | $133.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.7M | $136.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $316.3M | $142.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.3M | $136.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $227.4M | $135.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $221.2M | $179.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $178.1M | $169.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.8M | $175.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $391.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $400.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $429.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $419.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $424.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $495.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $503.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $509.2M |
| Q4 25 | 1.51× | 0.79× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | 0.79× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 0.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.22× | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.61× | 1.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.70× | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.37× | 0.84× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.93× | 0.89× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $47.5M | $12.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.2M | $8.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.0% | 5.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.99× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $148.8M | $34.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.1M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.4M | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $15.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.0M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.7M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.9M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.2M | $-2.4M |
| Q4 25 | $31.2M | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.9M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.4M | $17.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.3M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0M | $-30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.3M | $-20.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $6.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.8M | $-7.4M |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.4% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 6.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | -18.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.4% | -3.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.5% | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.61× | -1.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.18× | -0.80× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATMU
| Fuel Products | $219.1M | 49% |
| Lube | $84.8M | 19% |
| Air | $74.0M | 17% |
| Other | $68.7M | 15% |
| Related Party | $14.9M | 3% |
CVGI
| Global Seating | $70.7M | 46% |
| Global Electrical Systems | $49.7M | 32% |
| Trim Systems And Components | $34.4M | 22% |
