vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) and WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. (WH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($446.6M vs $334.0M, roughly 1.3× WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.). Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.7% vs -18.0%, a 28.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.8% vs -76.3%). WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($168.0M vs $31.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (2.3% CAGR vs -4.6%).
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. designs, manufactures and distributes high-performance filtration products and tailored solutions. Its portfolio covers air, fuel, oil and hydraulic filtration systems, serving global automotive, heavy-duty vehicle, industrial equipment and aerospace end markets, for both original equipment manufacturers and aftermarket replacement customers.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc., is an American hospitality company based in Parsippany, New Jersey, United States. It describes itself as the largest hotel franchisor in the world, with 9,100 locations.
ATMU vs WH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $446.6M | $334.0M |
| Net Profit | $48.0M | $-60.0M |
| Gross Margin | 28.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | — |
| Net Margin | 10.7% | -18.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.8% | -76.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 19.7% | -170.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.58 | $-0.80 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $334.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $446.6M | $334.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.7M | $382.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $453.5M | $397.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.5M | $316.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $406.7M | $336.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $403.7M | $396.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $367.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $48.0M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.8M | $105.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.9M | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $61.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.1M | $85.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8M | $102.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.2M | $86.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.8% | -11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.3% | 46.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 37.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.6% | 35.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | 43.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | 39.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | -18.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.2% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.0% | 23.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.80 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.58 | $-0.77 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.66 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.72 | $1.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $0.78 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.49 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.52 | $1.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.67 | $1.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $236.4M | $64.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $570.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $378.5M | $468.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.51× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $64.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $236.4M | $64.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.3M | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $190.8M | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $183.3M | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $184.3M | $103.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $196.8M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.5M | $70.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $570.0M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $577.5M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $585.0M | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $588.8M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.5M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.2M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $600.0M | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $468.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $378.5M | $468.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.7M | $583.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $316.3M | $570.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.3M | $579.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $227.4M | $650.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $221.2M | $583.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $178.1M | $623.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.51× | 5.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | 4.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 4.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.22× | 4.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.61× | 3.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.70× | 4.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.37× | 3.83× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $47.5M | $367.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.2M | $168.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.0% | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.99× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $148.8M | $437.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $367.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | $152.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.1M | $86.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.4M | $70.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $59.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.0M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.7M | $79.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.9M | $1.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $168.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $31.2M | $136.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.9M | $75.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.4M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.3M | $52.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0M | $109.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.3M | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $-6.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.4% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 16.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | -1.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.50× | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.74× | 0.80× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.64× | 0.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.50× | 1.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.61× | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.41× | 0.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATMU
| Fuel Products | $219.1M | 49% |
| Lube | $84.8M | 19% |
| Air | $74.0M | 17% |
| Other | $68.7M | 15% |
| Related Party | $14.9M | 3% |
WH
| Fee-related and other revenues | $334.0M | 100% |
| Management and other fees | $2.0M | 1% |
