vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASTRONICS CORP (ATRO) and CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP (CATY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ASTRONICS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($240.1M vs $222.8M, roughly 1.1× CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP). On growth, CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.5% vs 15.1%). CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($363.7M vs $15.8M). Over the past eight quarters, ASTRONICS CORP's revenue compounded faster (13.9% CAGR vs 12.8%).
Astronics Corporation is an American aerospace electronics corporation founded in 1968, headquartered in East Aurora, New York. It is traded on NASDAQ as Nasdaq: ATRO. It is known for lighting and electronics integrations on military, commercial, and business aircraft and semiconductor test systems.
Cathay General Bancorp is a U.S.-headquartered bank holding company that operates Cathay Bank, offering full-spectrum commercial and personal banking services. It primarily serves Asian American communities and small-to-medium enterprises across major U.S. states including California, New York and Texas, as well as select Asian markets, with products covering deposits, loans, and wealth management solutions.
ATRO vs CATY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $240.1M | $222.8M |
| Net Profit | — | $90.5M |
| Gross Margin | 33.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 14.8% | 50.9% |
| Net Margin | — | 653.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.1% | 19.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 12.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.82 | $1.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $240.1M | $222.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $211.4M | $210.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $204.7M | $196.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $205.9M | $187.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.5M | $186.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $203.7M | $189.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $198.1M | $178.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $185.1M | $175.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $90.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.1M | $77.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | $77.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.5M | $69.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $80.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.7M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $66.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.2M | $71.4M |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.8% | 50.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.9% | 44.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 49.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 46.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 46.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 41.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 40.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 45.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 653.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | 36.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | 37.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 587.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.8% | 35.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 37.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.7% | 40.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.82 | $1.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.31 | $1.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $1.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $1.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.34 | $0.94 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | $0.92 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.09 | $0.98 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $18.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $119.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $140.1M | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $706.7M | $24.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $119.1M |
| Q4 25 | $140.1M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.9M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.6M | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $266.8M | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $256.1M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $249.2M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $257.9M | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $251.7M | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $706.7M | $24.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $682.2M | $24.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $646.7M | $23.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $662.2M | $23.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $648.8M | $23.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $651.6M | $23.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.9M | $23.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $630.0M | $23.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.04× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $27.6M | $368.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $15.8M | $363.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.6% | 163.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.9% | 2.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.07× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $43.1M | $672.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.6M | $368.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.2M | $150.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.6M | $64.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.6M | $99.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.4M | $329.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $81.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.3M | $72.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | $88.2M |
| Q4 25 | $15.8M | $363.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.0M | $150.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.2M | $62.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.5M | $96.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.2M | $325.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.1M | $72.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.0K | $87.3M |
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 163.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 71.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.0% | 31.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 51.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.1% | 174.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 42.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.1% | 40.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 49.8% |
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.94× | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.81× | 0.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.17× | 1.42× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.10× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.08× | 1.09× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.23× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATRO
| Product Line Electrical Power And Motion | $113.8M | 47% |
| Product Line Avionics | $32.0M | 13% |
| Military Aircraft | $28.0M | 12% |
| General Aviation | $22.3M | 9% |
| Government And Defense | $20.5M | 9% |
| Product Line Systems Certification | $13.2M | 6% |
| Product Line Structures | $3.7M | 2% |
| Product Line Other | $2.3M | 1% |
CATY
Segment breakdown not available.
