vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) and OLB GROUP, INC. (OLB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OLB GROUP, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8M vs $1.0M, roughly 1.8× Aurora Innovation, Inc.). OLB GROUP, INC. runs the higher net margin — -83.7% vs -20100.0%, a 20016.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, OLB GROUP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (-28.7% CAGR vs -41.2%).
Aurora Innovation, Inc., doing business as Aurora, is a self-driving vehicle technology company based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Aurora has developed the Aurora Driver, a computer system that can be integrated into cars for autonomous driving. It was co-founded by Chris Urmson, the former chief technology officer of Google/Alphabet Inc.'s self-driving team, which became known as Waymo, as well as by Sterling Anderson, former head of Tesla Autopilot, and Drew Bagnell, former head of Uber's a...
OLB Group, Inc. is a global financial technology provider offering omnichannel payment processing solutions, e-commerce enablement tools, and digital banking services for small and medium-sized enterprises across North America, Europe, and key Asia-Pacific markets. Its core segments include merchant services, crypto payment integration, and cloud-based business management platforms.
AUR vs OLB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0M | $1.8M |
| Net Profit | $-201.0M | $-1.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -22200.0% | -83.7% |
| Net Margin | -20100.0% | -83.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -35.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.4% | 67.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $-0.48 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-201.0M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-201.0M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-208.0M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-182.0M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | -83.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -22200.0% | -49.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23000.0% | -74.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -36.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -166.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -52.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -74.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -82.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -83.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20100.0% | -50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20100.0% | -93.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -46.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -167.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -52.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -75.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -67.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.66 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.47 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.92 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $-1.49 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $87.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $4.6M |
| Total Assets | $2.5B | $12.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $206.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $29.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $27.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.0M | $41.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.0M | $53.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3K |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $6.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $8.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $12.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-149.0M | $-1.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-157.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -15700.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 800.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-645.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-149.0M | $-115.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-144.0M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-155.8K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-143.0M | $-376.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-176.0M | $-785.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-424.7K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-157.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-151.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-150.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-187.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -15700.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -15100.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 800.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 700.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AUR
Segment breakdown not available.
OLB
| Transaction And Processing Fees | $1.7M | 94% |
| Other | $99.2K | 6% |