vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Autolus Therapeutics plc (AUTL) and Americas Gold & Silver Corp (USAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Autolus Therapeutics plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.2M vs $19.1M, roughly 1.1× Americas Gold & Silver Corp). Americas Gold & Silver Corp runs the higher net margin — -82.3% vs -373.3%, a 291.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. Americas Gold & Silver Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-41.3M vs $-72.3M).
Autolus Therapeutics plc is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company specializing in the development of next-generation engineered chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies for the treatment of hematological malignancies and solid tumors. It operates in the global oncology biotech market, advancing a pipeline of targeted immunotherapy candidates across multiple clinical development stages.
Pan American Silver Corporation is a mining company based in Canada with operations in Latin America. The company has mines and other projects in Mexico, Peru, Bolivia, and Argentina.
AUTL vs USAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.2M | $19.1M |
| Net Profit | $-79.1M | $-15.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.2% |
| Operating Margin | -337.9% | — |
| Net Margin | -373.3% | -82.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -28.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.6% | 2.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.30 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $21.2M | $19.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $26.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.1M | — |
| Q3 25 | $-79.1M | $-15.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-47.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-70.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-82.1M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-58.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-52.7M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -337.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -292.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -726.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -384.1% | — |
| Q3 25 | -373.3% | -82.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -229.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -781.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -60.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -522.1% | — |
| Q3 25 | $-0.30 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.26 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.31 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.22 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.24 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $86.1M | $39.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $265.5M | $50.2M |
| Total Assets | $661.9M | $234.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $86.1M | $39.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $657.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $705.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $758.5M | — |
| Q3 25 | $265.5M | $50.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $371.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $477.0M | $53.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $527.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $582.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | $661.9M | $234.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $721.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $746.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $827.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $853.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $901.4M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-67.9M | $-12.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-72.3M | $-41.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -341.2% | -216.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 20.8% | 150.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-322.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-67.9M | $-12.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-72.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-75.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-76.7M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-51.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-40.5M | — |
| Q3 25 | $-72.3M | $-41.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-80.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-83.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-86.3M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-51.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-41.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | -341.2% | -216.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -382.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -933.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -42.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -406.8% | — |
| Q3 25 | 20.8% | 150.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 91.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 51.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
