vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Anteris Technologies Global Corp. (AVR) and Sidus Space Inc. (SIDU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sidus Space Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($366.0K vs $310.0K, roughly 1.2× Anteris Technologies Global Corp.). Sidus Space Inc. runs the higher net margin — -3115.2% vs -9420.0%, a 6304.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. Sidus Space Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-6.5M vs $-18.9M).
Anteris Technologies Global Corp is a medical technology firm specializing in innovative structural heart care solutions. It develops and commercializes bioprosthetic heart valves and transcatheter intervention products, serving healthcare providers across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, with core focus on cardiac surgery and interventional cardiology segments.
Sidus Space Inc is a U.S.-headquartered space technology and services provider specializing in small satellite design, manufacturing and operation. It offers end-to-end space solutions including data analytics, on-orbit servicing and custom hardware for commercial, government and academic clients worldwide, supporting various space mission objectives.
AVR vs SIDU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $310.0K | $366.0K |
| Net Profit | $-29.2M | $-11.4M |
| Gross Margin | 70.6% | -474.9% |
| Operating Margin | -9343.5% | -3009.2% |
| Net Margin | -9420.0% | -3115.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -16.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -100.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.74 | $-0.29 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $310.0K | $366.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $429.0K | $559.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $618.0K | $691.1K | ||
| Q1 25 | $556.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $436.5K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $834.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $845.1K |
| Q4 25 | $-29.2M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-22.2M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.8M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.8M |
| Q4 25 | 70.6% | -474.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 71.3% | -232.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.1% | -148.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -171.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -100.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.9% |
| Q4 25 | -9343.5% | -3009.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5190.0% | -1007.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3379.3% | -765.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3917.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1165.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -180.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -466.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -421.4% |
| Q4 25 | -9420.0% | -3115.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5185.1% | -1079.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3371.2% | -814.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3932.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1300.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -222.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -495.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -450.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.74 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.62 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.61 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.93 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.99 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $22.0K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-93.0K | $50.6M |
| Total Assets | $23.0M | $66.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $22.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-93.0K | $50.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | $24.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.4M | $14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $23.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.2M |
| Q4 25 | $23.0M | $66.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.1M | $39.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.9M | $29.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $37.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $23.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $25.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.5M | $-4.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-18.9M | $-6.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6104.5% | -1768.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 128.1% | 651.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-79.8M | $-28.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-18.5M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.3M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.5M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-5.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-18.9M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.0M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.1M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.6M |
| Q4 25 | -6104.5% | -1768.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4434.5% | -1369.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3247.9% | -870.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3909.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1811.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -213.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -477.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -905.0% |
| Q4 25 | 128.1% | 651.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 180.0% | 256.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.9% | 199.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 543.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 58.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 220.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 263.9% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
