vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Anteris Technologies Global Corp. (AVR) and Safe Pro Group Inc. (SPAI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Anteris Technologies Global Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($310.0K vs $227.7K, roughly 1.4× Safe Pro Group Inc.). Safe Pro Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1507.6% vs -9420.0%, a 7912.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. Safe Pro Group Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-2.7M vs $-18.9M).
Anteris Technologies Global Corp is a medical technology firm specializing in innovative structural heart care solutions. It develops and commercializes bioprosthetic heart valves and transcatheter intervention products, serving healthcare providers across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, with core focus on cardiac surgery and interventional cardiology segments.
AVR vs SPAI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $310.0K | $227.7K |
| Net Profit | $-29.2M | $-3.4M |
| Gross Margin | 70.6% | 33.1% |
| Operating Margin | -9343.5% | -1936.2% |
| Net Margin | -9420.0% | -1507.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.74 | $-0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $310.0K | $227.7K | ||
| Q3 25 | $429.0K | $101.4K | ||
| Q2 25 | $618.0K | $92.8K | ||
| Q1 25 | $556.0K | $184.8K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $330.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $643.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-29.2M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-22.2M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.8M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.9M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.2M |
| Q4 25 | 70.6% | 33.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 71.3% | 33.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.1% | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.8% | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 40.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.7% |
| Q4 25 | -9343.5% | -1936.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5190.0% | -4148.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3379.3% | -2073.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3917.3% | -2167.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1070.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -174.6% |
| Q4 25 | -9420.0% | -1507.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5185.1% | -4940.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3371.2% | -2064.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3932.4% | -2145.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1114.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -188.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.74 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.62 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.61 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $22.0K | $146.0K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-93.0K | $17.7M |
| Total Assets | $23.0M | $19.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $22.0K | $146.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.0K | $146.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.0K | $146.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.0K | $146.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $146.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $256.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-93.0K | $17.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.4M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.3M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $531.4K |
| Q4 25 | $23.0M | $19.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.1M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.9M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.8M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.01× | 0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 0.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | 0.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.48× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.5M | $-2.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-18.9M | $-2.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6104.5% | -1181.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 128.1% | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-79.8M | $-6.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-18.5M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.3M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.5M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.5M | $-941.8K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-18.9M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.0M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.1M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.7M | $-960.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -6104.5% | -1181.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4434.5% | -1579.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3247.9% | -1092.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3909.5% | -519.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -577.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 128.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 180.0% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.9% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.6% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
