vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Solowin Holdings, Ltd. (AXG) and HiTek Global Inc. (HKIT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HiTek Global Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($741.5K vs $410.0K, roughly 1.8× Solowin Holdings, Ltd.).
DB HiTek Co., Ltd., formerly Dongbu HiTek, is a semiconductor contract manufacturing and design company headquartered in Bucheon, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea. DB HiTek is one of the major contract chip manufacturers, alongside TSMC, Samsung Electronics, GlobalFoundries, and UMC. It is also the second-largest foundry company in South Korea, behind Samsung Electronics.
AXG vs HKIT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $410.0K | $741.5K |
| Net Profit | — | $-916.1K |
| Gross Margin | — | 23.4% |
| Operating Margin | -34.1% | -181.7% |
| Net Margin | — | -123.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -59.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -853.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | — | $741.5K | ||
| Q3 24 | $410.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $2.9M |
| Q2 25 | — | $-916.1K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $121.7K | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $622.0K |
| Q2 25 | — | 23.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.0% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 50.9% |
| Q2 25 | — | -181.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -34.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -20.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 17.2% |
| Q2 25 | — | -123.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 21.1% |
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.5M | $29.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.0M | $34.6M |
| Total Assets | $13.1M | $41.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | $29.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $25.4M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $12.2M |
| Q2 25 | — | $34.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $28.1M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $26.0M |
| Q2 25 | — | $41.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $43.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $33.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.6M | $1.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -392.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $754.1K | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $200.9K |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $744.3K | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $60.3K |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -392.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.6% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 2.0% |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 4.8% |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.20× | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 0.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
