vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Axil Brands, Inc. (AXIL) and PURE CYCLE CORP (PCYO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PURE CYCLE CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.1M vs $8.1M, roughly 1.1× Axil Brands, Inc.). PURE CYCLE CORP runs the higher net margin — 50.0% vs 8.7%, a 41.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PURE CYCLE CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (58.8% vs 5.2%). Over the past eight quarters, PURE CYCLE CORP's revenue compounded faster (69.0% CAGR vs 12.1%).
Axil Brands, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered company that designs, manufactures and markets premium hearing protection products, audio enhancement devices and personal audio accessories. Its offerings include custom-fit earplugs, Bluetooth-enabled hearing buds for work, sports and leisure use, serving both consumer and professional segments across global markets.
Pure Cycles, is a bicycle company based in Los Angeles, California that was founded by Michael Fishman, Jordan Schau, Zachary Schau and Austin Stoffers in 2010, as Pure Fix Cycles.
AXIL vs PCYO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.1M | $9.1M |
| Net Profit | $704.9K | $4.6M |
| Gross Margin | 68.1% | 68.4% |
| Operating Margin | 11.1% | 48.0% |
| Net Margin | 8.7% | 50.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.2% | 58.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 11.2% | 16.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.09 | $0.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $8.1M | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9M | $4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9M | $12.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.5M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.5M | $3.2M |
| Q4 25 | $704.9K | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.3K | $6.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-245.6K | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.7K | $809.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $633.7K | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-109.8K | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.5K | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $781.1K | $118.0K |
| Q4 25 | 68.1% | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.6% | 67.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 70.0% | 63.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 71.7% | 38.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 71.1% | 63.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 71.0% | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 71.5% | 64.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 71.5% | 55.6% |
| Q4 25 | 11.1% | 48.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.0% | 53.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 26.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | -33.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.4% | 62.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 40.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.6% | -11.5% |
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | 50.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 54.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | 43.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.9% | 52.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.1% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.09 | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.04 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.07 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.02 | $0.27 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.04 | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.0M | $17.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $138.3K | $8.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.1M | $147.5M |
| Total Assets | $16.2M | $168.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.01× | 0.05× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.0M | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $21.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $19.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | $20.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.9M | $20.6M |
| Q4 25 | $138.3K | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.2K | $6.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.2K | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0K | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.3K | $6.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.3K | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.6K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $11.1M | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.2M | $142.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7M | $136.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.7M | $134.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8M | $133.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $129.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $123.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.8M | $120.4M |
| Q4 25 | $16.2M | $168.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.4M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.9M | $151.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.0M | $149.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.7M | $149.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $147.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | $140.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | $135.2M |
| Q4 25 | 0.01× | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.01× | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.01× | 0.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | 0.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.02× | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.02× | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $934.8K | $-979.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $906.4K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.33× | -0.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $934.8K | $-979.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-739.2K | $9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.4K | $-503.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-169.9K | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0M | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $897.3K | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-336.6K | $892.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-912.8K | $-457.0K |
| Q4 25 | $906.4K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-747.6K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-258.2K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $941.1K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-394.9K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-922.1K | — |
| Q4 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.33× | -0.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.21× | 1.53× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.29× | -1.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.59× | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.80× | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.17× | -3.87× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AXIL
| Hearing Enhancement And Protection | $7.8M | 95% |
| Other | $378.9K | 5% |
PCYO
| Construction | $6.5M | 71% |
| Water And Wastewater Resource Development Segment | $2.5M | 27% |
